Cross-Validation of GEMS Total Ozone from Ozone Profile and Total Column Products Using Pandora and Satellite Observations

This study presents a comprehensive validation of total ozone columns from ozone profile (O3P) and total ozone column (O3T) products measured by the Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS), through comparisons with Pandora, Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) and TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI). O3P version 3.0 demonstrates reduced dependence on viewing geometry compared to version 2.0, whereas the O3T product shows a consistent offset between versions (v2.0 vs. v2.1). In comparison with Pandora, O3P exhibits seasonal bias patterns similar to those seen in TROPOMI and OMPS, ranging from −2% in summer to +5% in winter. However, O3T maintains abnormally persistent negative biases across seasons and times of day, along with a long-term degradation of 2–3% from 2021 to 2024. These findings suggest that O3T biases likely result from uncorrected radiometric biases rather than algorithmic limitations. Validation metrics further highlight inconsistencies in O3T, including a lower regression slope (~0.95) in the mid-latitude and higher root mean square errors in the low-latitude (~5%), compared to the other products (near 1.0 and 1–3%, respectively). Overall, O3P outperforms TROPOMI and OMPS across most validation metrics in mid-latitudes and performs similarly at low latitudes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17183249
Primary Topic
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-Validation of GEMS Total Ozone from Ozone Profile and Total Column Products Using Pandora and Satellite Observations

Lim‐Seok Chang, Arno Keppens, Kai Yang, Jhoon Kim et al.
Remote Sensing
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
article

Cross-Validation of GEMS Total Ozone from Ozone Profile and Total Column Products Using Pandora and Satellite Observations

Lim‐Seok Chang, Arno Keppens, Kai Yang, Jhoon Kim, Juseon Bak, Xiong Liu, Jae-Hwan Kim, Hyunjin Lee, Mijeong Kim, Kanghyun Baek, Sungjae Hong
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive validation of total ozone columns from ozone profile (O3P) and total ozone column (O3T) products measured by the Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS), through comparisons with Pandora, Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) and TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI). O3P version 3.0 demonstrates reduced dependence on viewing geometry compared to version 2.0, whereas the O3T product shows a consistent offset between versions (v2.0 vs. v2.1). In comparison with Pandora, O3P exhibits seasonal bias patterns similar to those seen in TROPOMI and OMPS, ranging from −2% in summer to +5% in winter. However, O3T maintains abnormally persistent negative biases across seasons and times of day, along with a long-term degradation of 2–3% from 2021 to 2024. These findings suggest that O3T biases likely result from uncorrected radiometric biases rather than algorithmic limitations. Validation metrics further highlight inconsistencies in O3T, including a lower regression slope (~0.95) in the mid-latitude and higher root mean square errors in the low-latitude (~5%), compared to the other products (near 1.0 and 1–3%, respectively). Overall, O3P outperforms TROPOMI and OMPS across most validation metrics in mid-latitudes and performs similarly at low latitudes.

Remote SensingVol. 17(18)
Goddard Space Flight Center (US), Yonsei University (KR), Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BE), Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US), Pusan National University (KR), National Institute of Environmental Research (KR), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
National Institute of Environmental Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.