AI in Automated and Remote UX Evaluation: A Systematic Review (2014–2024)

This systematic literature review examines the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into automated and remote usability and user experience (UX) evaluation methods. Synthesizing insights from 55 peer‐reviewed articles published between 2014 and 2024, the review identifies key AI technologies, such as machine learning, large language models (LLMs), generative AI (GenAI), and ChatGPT, and their roles in enhancing UX evaluation practices. While these technologies contribute to behavior modeling, sentiment analysis, feedback generation, and user simulation, their increasing use also introduces critical challenges. AI models often function as opaque “black boxes,” raising concerns about transparency, hallucinated outputs, contextual misinterpretation, and data bias. The review underscores the need for explainable, human‐in‐the‐loop AI systems, standardized evaluation frameworks, and responsible deployment practices. Specific implications for practice include integrating explainable AI (XAI) methods such as SHAP and counterfactual explanations to improve the transparency of UX insights; adopting domain adaptation and transfer learning to improve generalizability across platforms, demographics, and task contexts; and ensuring human oversight through human‐in‐the‐loop mechanisms to mitigate risks such as hallucinations and contextual misinterpretation. This study offers a comprehensive foundation for both future research and informed adoption of AI technologies in UX workflows, supporting more efficient, data‐driven, and human‐centered evaluation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/ahci/7442179
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI in Automated and Remote UX Evaluation: A Systematic Review (2014–2024)

Jia Liu
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

AI in Automated and Remote UX Evaluation: A Systematic Review (2014–2024)

Jia Liu
article en

Abstract

This systematic literature review examines the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into automated and remote usability and user experience (UX) evaluation methods. Synthesizing insights from 55 peer‐reviewed articles published between 2014 and 2024, the review identifies key AI technologies, such as machine learning, large language models (LLMs), generative AI (GenAI), and ChatGPT, and their roles in enhancing UX evaluation practices. While these technologies contribute to behavior modeling, sentiment analysis, feedback generation, and user simulation, their increasing use also introduces critical challenges. AI models often function as opaque “black boxes,” raising concerns about transparency, hallucinated outputs, contextual misinterpretation, and data bias. The review underscores the need for explainable, human‐in‐the‐loop AI systems, standardized evaluation frameworks, and responsible deployment practices. Specific implications for practice include integrating explainable AI (XAI) methods such as SHAP and counterfactual explanations to improve the transparency of UX insights; adopting domain adaptation and transfer learning to improve generalizability across platforms, demographics, and task contexts; and ensuring human oversight through human‐in‐the‐loop mechanisms to mitigate risks such as hallucinations and contextual misinterpretation. This study offers a comprehensive foundation for both future research and informed adoption of AI technologies in UX workflows, supporting more efficient, data‐driven, and human‐centered evaluation strategies.

Advances in Human-Computer InteractionVol. 2025(1)
Texas A&M University-Victoria (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI in Automated and Remote UX Evaluation: A Systematic Review (2014–2024) — Jia Liu · Advances in Human-Computer Interaction (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS