In Vitro Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Resorbable Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: In vitro evaluation of macro and microscopic features of five resorbable barrier membranes used for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) in oral hard tissue surgery. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Five different resorbable barrier membranes were analyzed by optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For each sample, surface appearance, the presence and size of ridges and depressions, number of layers, and the inner structure were recorded. Each membrane was cut into 1 × 1 cm squares to determine mass, density and thickness. In addition, an EDX microanalysis was performed. <i>Results</i>: Under optical microscopy, all membranes appeared rough, with ridges and depressions. In cross-section, only Sample 2 presented true stratification. On SEM, most membranes showed a three-dimensional collagen fiber architecture. Sample 3, a sheet of collagenated equine bone, differed accordingly. EDX spectra showed broadly overlapping elemental composition, characterized by N, O and C. The mass depends on the composition: bone-containing membranes weighed more; those composed predominantly of collagen weighed less. <i>Conclusions</i>: Pore size, surface density and roughness, and the type of cross-linking can influence cell interaction and may lead to different regenerative scenarios, potentially improving the quality and timing of tissue regeneration. Membrane selection should be dictated by the clinical scenario, prioritizing properties most advantageous for the defect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61091720
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Vitro Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Resorbable Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration

Filiberto Mastrangelo, Isabella Catalano, Donato Antonacci, Federico Gaudelli et al.
Medicina
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

In Vitro Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Resorbable Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration

Filiberto Mastrangelo, Isabella Catalano, Donato Antonacci, Federico Gaudelli, Rossella Padula
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: In vitro evaluation of macro and microscopic features of five resorbable barrier membranes used for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) in oral hard tissue surgery. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Five different resorbable barrier membranes were analyzed by optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For each sample, surface appearance, the presence and size of ridges and depressions, number of layers, and the inner structure were recorded. Each membrane was cut into 1 × 1 cm squares to determine mass, density and thickness. In addition, an EDX microanalysis was performed. <i>Results</i>: Under optical microscopy, all membranes appeared rough, with ridges and depressions. In cross-section, only Sample 2 presented true stratification. On SEM, most membranes showed a three-dimensional collagen fiber architecture. Sample 3, a sheet of collagenated equine bone, differed accordingly. EDX spectra showed broadly overlapping elemental composition, characterized by N, O and C. The mass depends on the composition: bone-containing membranes weighed more; those composed predominantly of collagen weighed less. <i>Conclusions</i>: Pore size, surface density and roughness, and the type of cross-linking can influence cell interaction and may lead to different regenerative scenarios, potentially improving the quality and timing of tissue regeneration. Membrane selection should be dictated by the clinical scenario, prioritizing properties most advantageous for the defect.

MedicinaVol. 61(9)
University of Foggia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.