Differences in sentence repetition tasks in studies on bilingual children’s language development: A systematic review

Aims and Objectives: Sentence repetition (SRep) tasks are a popular, valid, and cost-effective method of measuring language development. However, their heterogeneity and flexibility of use and adaptation may impact the obtained results. This may be particularly significant when using SRep tasks to identify language problems in children. Methodology: To bring attention to this issue, we carried out a systematic review of English-language studies using SRep tasks with samples of bilingual children with and without language problems. We report the results of a systematic review according to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Data and Analysis: A total of 774 records were screened, resulting in 141 studies subjected to a narrative analysis to characterize the versions of the reported SRep tasks used. Findings: Aside from summarizing broad publication trends regarding SRep tasks in studies on bilingual children, our systematic review found variability in the specific formal characteristics of the SRep tasks as reported in the publications. In particular, task standardization, length, and procedure as well as the use of analog versus digital versions of the SRep task emerged as potentially significant areas of differences. Originality: We offer an overview of how SRep tasks are structured and reported in the literature on bilingual children and language problems, pointing to areas of difference which, unless further examined, may impair conclusions and generalizations. We also offer suggestions on how to improve the transparency and clarity of reporting the methodological details of the SRep tasks. Implications: The systematic review lays out directions of further studies to refine the SRep methodology as applied to bilingual children and identifying language problems. Our findings have the potential to stimulate empirical research into how various characteristics of the SRep task may introduce unwanted variability into the measurement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Bilingualism
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069251358991
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in sentence repetition tasks in studies on bilingual children’s language development: A systematic review

Jakub Romaneczko, Maria Obarska, Piotr Kałowski, Natalia Banasik‐Jemielniak et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Bilingualism
Language Development and Disorders
3.44
article

Differences in sentence repetition tasks in studies on bilingual children’s language development: A systematic review

Jakub Romaneczko, Maria Obarska, Piotr Kałowski, Natalia Banasik‐Jemielniak, Dawid Walczak
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aims and Objectives: Sentence repetition (SRep) tasks are a popular, valid, and cost-effective method of measuring language development. However, their heterogeneity and flexibility of use and adaptation may impact the obtained results. This may be particularly significant when using SRep tasks to identify language problems in children. Methodology: To bring attention to this issue, we carried out a systematic review of English-language studies using SRep tasks with samples of bilingual children with and without language problems. We report the results of a systematic review according to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Data and Analysis: A total of 774 records were screened, resulting in 141 studies subjected to a narrative analysis to characterize the versions of the reported SRep tasks used. Findings: Aside from summarizing broad publication trends regarding SRep tasks in studies on bilingual children, our systematic review found variability in the specific formal characteristics of the SRep tasks as reported in the publications. In particular, task standardization, length, and procedure as well as the use of analog versus digital versions of the SRep task emerged as potentially significant areas of differences. Originality: We offer an overview of how SRep tasks are structured and reported in the literature on bilingual children and language problems, pointing to areas of difference which, unless further examined, may impair conclusions and generalizations. We also offer suggestions on how to improve the transparency and clarity of reporting the methodological details of the SRep tasks. Implications: The systematic review lays out directions of further studies to refine the SRep methodology as applied to bilingual children and identifying language problems. Our findings have the potential to stimulate empirical research into how various characteristics of the SRep task may introduce unwanted variability into the measurement.

International Journal of BilingualismVol. 29(6)
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (PL), Vigo (Poland) (PL), The Maria Grzegorzewska University (PL), University of Warsaw (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Language Development and Disorders
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.