POETRY READINGS: AN ANTHROPOLOGIST’S VIEW

This article analyzes the problem of studying a particular type of literary gathering, namely poetry readings, which can be formulated using two questions: 1) why do people gather for poetry readings, 2) what methodology would be appropriate in studying these gatherings? Answers to these questions are given from the standpoint of cultural anthropology, using the methodological tools of sociology and folklore studies. Reading practices vary depending on the goals, structure, and composition of participants. The author examines such reading practices as Tsvetaeva’s bonfires (gatherings of readers) and readings of contemporary poetry (gatherings of authors), which, despite all the differences, possess the spirit of communitas (participatory anti-structurality), allowing communities to “reassemble” and reactualize identity in the rituals of readings. Participants adjust their perception differently depending on the type of gathering. Tsvetaeva’s bonfires require “sincerity” – a demonstration of empathy and special emotional intensity, appealing to the main goal – expanding the network of the community, strengthening the cultural status of the event. Contemporary poetry evenings unfold through carnival irony. They are characterized by anti-behavior, that is, a conscious violation of social norms. Both forms of poetry gatherings transmit the spirit of communitas, according to W. Turner.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Literary Theory Linguistics Cultural Studies Series
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-6-67-80
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

POETRY READINGS: AN ANTHROPOLOGIST’S VIEW

Elena F. Levochskaya, Sergei S. Levochskii
RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Literary Theory Linguistics Cultural Studies Series
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

POETRY READINGS: AN ANTHROPOLOGIST’S VIEW

Elena F. Levochskaya, Sergei S. Levochskii
article en

Abstract

This article analyzes the problem of studying a particular type of literary gathering, namely poetry readings, which can be formulated using two questions: 1) why do people gather for poetry readings, 2) what methodology would be appropriate in studying these gatherings? Answers to these questions are given from the standpoint of cultural anthropology, using the methodological tools of sociology and folklore studies. Reading practices vary depending on the goals, structure, and composition of participants. The author examines such reading practices as Tsvetaeva’s bonfires (gatherings of readers) and readings of contemporary poetry (gatherings of authors), which, despite all the differences, possess the spirit of communitas (participatory anti-structurality), allowing communities to “reassemble” and reactualize identity in the rituals of readings. Participants adjust their perception differently depending on the type of gathering. Tsvetaeva’s bonfires require “sincerity” – a demonstration of empathy and special emotional intensity, appealing to the main goal – expanding the network of the community, strengthening the cultural status of the event. Contemporary poetry evenings unfold through carnival irony. They are characterized by anti-behavior, that is, a conscious violation of social norms. Both forms of poetry gatherings transmit the spirit of communitas, according to W. Turner.

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Literary Theory Linguistics Cultural Studies Series(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.