The Ontological Compatibility of Methodological Naturalism with a Benevolent, Infinite God

This paper works to explore the ontological compatibility of methodological naturalism with the concept of a benevolent, infinite God. Methodological naturalism, which is intended to operate independently of metaphysical claims, offers a neutral stance on the existence of deities; maintaining the empirical integrity of the scientific method. In examining four leading models of divinity, this paper assesses their potential to align with methodological naturalism while preserving divine attributes of infinity and benevolence. The paper then argues that, of the four, panentheism provides the most suitable framework for the integration of such a deity into a methodologically naturalistic framing. The combined model maintains the empirical constraints of methodological naturalism while allowing for a divine presence that embodies ultimate goodness in an infinite nature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies on Religion and Philosophy
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71204/b9cj9459
Primary Topic
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Ontological Compatibility of Methodological Naturalism with a Benevolent, Infinite God

Niq Ruud
Studies on Religion and Philosophy
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
article

The Ontological Compatibility of Methodological Naturalism with a Benevolent, Infinite God

Niq Ruud
article en

Abstract

This paper works to explore the ontological compatibility of methodological naturalism with the concept of a benevolent, infinite God. Methodological naturalism, which is intended to operate independently of metaphysical claims, offers a neutral stance on the existence of deities; maintaining the empirical integrity of the scientific method. In examining four leading models of divinity, this paper assesses their potential to align with methodological naturalism while preserving divine attributes of infinity and benevolence. The paper then argues that, of the four, panentheism provides the most suitable framework for the integration of such a deity into a methodologically naturalistic framing. The combined model maintains the empirical constraints of methodological naturalism while allowing for a divine presence that embodies ultimate goodness in an infinite nature.

Studies on Religion and PhilosophyVol. 1(3)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Ontological Compatibility of Methodological Naturalism with a Benevolent, Infinite God — Niq Ruud · Studies on Religion and Philosophy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS