It takes a village... Program-wide approaches to redesigning assessment in a time of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI).

The rapid maturation of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) platforms has created significant challenges for higher education, particularly in relation to assessment. This project sought to explore the lived experiences and views of GenAI in relation to assessment for academics and students in higher education. A qualitative interpretivist approach was adopted, using semi-structured interviews. When data were thematically analysed, three themes were developed; emotions, academic role and identity; assessment must change, and the work and expertise required to change assessment. Academics and students experienced both positive and negative emotions in relation to GenAI. Concerns about the complexity of changing assessment and resources needed to change assessment were pervasive. Based on these findings we propose that “it takes a village” to redevelop assessments in a time of GenAI and therefore collaborative, program-wide approaches are the way forward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53761/zpp2ja61
Primary Topic
Higher Education Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

It takes a village... Program-wide approaches to redesigning assessment in a time of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI).

Phillip Dawson, Susie Macfarlane, Kelli Nicola‐Richmond, Partridge Helen
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
Higher Education Learning Practices
article

It takes a village... Program-wide approaches to redesigning assessment in a time of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI).

Phillip Dawson, Susie Macfarlane, Kelli Nicola‐Richmond, Partridge Helen
article en

Abstract

The rapid maturation of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) platforms has created significant challenges for higher education, particularly in relation to assessment. This project sought to explore the lived experiences and views of GenAI in relation to assessment for academics and students in higher education. A qualitative interpretivist approach was adopted, using semi-structured interviews. When data were thematically analysed, three themes were developed; emotions, academic role and identity; assessment must change, and the work and expertise required to change assessment. Academics and students experienced both positive and negative emotions in relation to GenAI. Concerns about the complexity of changing assessment and resources needed to change assessment were pervasive. Based on these findings we propose that “it takes a village” to redevelop assessments in a time of GenAI and therefore collaborative, program-wide approaches are the way forward.

Journal of University Teaching and Learning PracticeVol. 22(7)
Deakin University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Higher Education Learning Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.