The Constitutional Foundations of White Supremacy: Evidence from the States

Abstract The United States federal system reserved most powers regarding race and rights to the states, and the states constructed and maintained the legal foundations of White Supremacy in their constitutions. We propose a conceptual typology of four overlapping types of White Supremacy Constitutionalism: Enslavement provisions protecting the institution of slavery; “Race-Neutral” provisions, which appear colorblind but have racially discriminatory intentions and/or effects; Explicit provisions, that is, text openly reserving rights and power to White men; and Dead Letter provisions, text retained in state constitutions, either through indifference or purpose, after being rendered unconstitutional at the federal level. This article provides the first full account of the insertion and removal of the five types of provisions within the Explicit category, those governing: racial exclusion, apportionment, voting, office-holding, and gun ownership/militia service. We propose an explanation for the temporal and spatial patterning of this Explicit White Supremacy Constitutionalism and present the first full analysis of “Dead Letter” White Supremacy Constitutionalism. We hope to contribute to public discourse on—and urgently encourage scholarly work on—the role of White Supremacy in our nation’s history and politics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Publius The Journal of Federalism
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjaf054
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Constitutional Foundations of White Supremacy: Evidence from the States

Daniel Kryder, Paul E. Herron
Publius The Journal of Federalism
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

The Constitutional Foundations of White Supremacy: Evidence from the States

Daniel Kryder, Paul E. Herron
article en

Abstract

Abstract The United States federal system reserved most powers regarding race and rights to the states, and the states constructed and maintained the legal foundations of White Supremacy in their constitutions. We propose a conceptual typology of four overlapping types of White Supremacy Constitutionalism: Enslavement provisions protecting the institution of slavery; “Race-Neutral” provisions, which appear colorblind but have racially discriminatory intentions and/or effects; Explicit provisions, that is, text openly reserving rights and power to White men; and Dead Letter provisions, text retained in state constitutions, either through indifference or purpose, after being rendered unconstitutional at the federal level. This article provides the first full account of the insertion and removal of the five types of provisions within the Explicit category, those governing: racial exclusion, apportionment, voting, office-holding, and gun ownership/militia service. We propose an explanation for the temporal and spatial patterning of this Explicit White Supremacy Constitutionalism and present the first full analysis of “Dead Letter” White Supremacy Constitutionalism. We hope to contribute to public discourse on—and urgently encourage scholarly work on—the role of White Supremacy in our nation’s history and politics.

Publius The Journal of Federalism
Providence College (US), Brandeis University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Constitutional Foundations of White Supremacy: Evidence from the States — Daniel Kryder, Paul E. Herron · Publius The Journal of Federalism (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS