Emergence of activation or repression in transcriptional control under a fixed molecular context

Transcription factors (TFs) can be both activators and repressors of gene transcription. This can manifest as "duality," where the transcriptional response increases (activation) with TF concentration in one context but decreases (repression) in another context, or as "nonmonotonicity," where, in the same context, the response increases in part of the concentration range and decreases outside that range. Here we use biophysical models of gene regulation to investigate how duality and nonmonotonicity relate to the interactions between a TF, Polymerase and the regulatory DNA. We distinguish two modes of TF action on Polymerase: "coherent," with interactions either positive or negative, and "incoherent," where interactions are a mix of both. For TFs that act incoherently from a single TF-DNA binding site, nonmonotonicity can arise, but only under nonequilibrium models. For single-site models, we show that nonmonotonicity can never happen under the common thermodynamic models of gene regulation, which consider equilibrium conditions and ignore the dissipative nature of the transcription process. Moreover, we show that merely changing the TF-DNA binding affinity, while keeping other features fixed, can tune the response between activation and repression, with responses either evaluated as a function of TF concentration or site number. Using the mammalian Sp1 as a case study and synthetically designed target sequences, we find experimental evidence for nonmonotonicity, and activation or repression tuned by affinity, which we interpret as evidence of incoherent action. Our work highlights the importance of moving from a TF-centric view to a systems view when reasoning about transcriptional control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2413715122
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emergence of activation or repression in transcriptional control under a fixed molecular context

Dhana Friedrich, Rosa Martinez-Corral, Angela H. DePace, Lars Velten et al.
2 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
1.61
article

Emergence of activation or repression in transcriptional control under a fixed molecular context

Dhana Friedrich, Rosa Martinez-Corral, Angela H. DePace, Lars Velten, Jeremy Gunawardena, Robert Frömel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Transcription factors (TFs) can be both activators and repressors of gene transcription. This can manifest as "duality," where the transcriptional response increases (activation) with TF concentration in one context but decreases (repression) in another context, or as "nonmonotonicity," where, in the same context, the response increases in part of the concentration range and decreases outside that range. Here we use biophysical models of gene regulation to investigate how duality and nonmonotonicity relate to the interactions between a TF, Polymerase and the regulatory DNA. We distinguish two modes of TF action on Polymerase: "coherent," with interactions either positive or negative, and "incoherent," where interactions are a mix of both. For TFs that act incoherently from a single TF-DNA binding site, nonmonotonicity can arise, but only under nonequilibrium models. For single-site models, we show that nonmonotonicity can never happen under the common thermodynamic models of gene regulation, which consider equilibrium conditions and ignore the dissipative nature of the transcription process. Moreover, we show that merely changing the TF-DNA binding affinity, while keeping other features fixed, can tune the response between activation and repression, with responses either evaluated as a function of TF concentration or site number. Using the mammalian Sp1 as a case study and synthetically designed target sequences, we find experimental evidence for nonmonotonicity, and activation or repression tuned by affinity, which we interpret as evidence of incoherent action. Our work highlights the importance of moving from a TF-centric view to a systems view when reasoning about transcriptional control.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(39)
Harvard University (US), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Harvard University Press (US), Shanghai Institute for Science of Science (CN), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (ES), Centre for Genomic Regulation (ES), Predictive Biology (United States) (US), Center for Systems Biology (US), Institute of Science and Technology
National Science Foundation, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Centres de Recerca de Catalunya, European Commission, Generalitat de Catalunya, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, National Institutes of Health, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.