Maladaptive emotion regulation strategies as mediators in the relationship between gaming disorder and psychological pain, depression, and anxiety

Video game use disorder, classified in the ICD-11 as a behavioral addiction (code: 6C51), is characterized by impaired control over gaming, prioritization of gaming over other activities, and continuation despite negative consequences. Affecting an estimated 3.3% of the global population and 3.7% in Poland, it has been linked to symptoms of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress. Individuals struggling with this disorder often exhibit difficulties in emotion regulation, which may lead to the adoption of maladaptive coping strategies such as rumination, self-blame, or catastrophizing. These strategies not only reinforce problematic gaming behaviors as a means of escaping negative emotional states but may also intensify symptoms of mental health issues. The aim of this study was to examine the role of maladaptive emotion regulation strategies in the relationship between video game use disorder and psychological pain, anxiety, and depression. Methods: The study included 201 Polish computer game players who completed five standardized self-report measures: the IGD-20 (symptoms of Internet Gaming Disorder), HADS (symptoms of anxiety and depression), PAS (psychological pain), and the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (KPRE; emotion regulation strategies). Mediation models were analyzed in R (version 4.5.1) using the lavaan package with bootstrap confidence interval estimation (5000 samples, 95% CI). Results: Mediation analysis showed that catastrophizing mediated the relationship between Internet Gaming Disorder and all psychopathological variables. Rumination was a significant mediator only for anxiety, while self-blame mediated the relationship with psychological pain. Blaming others did not serve as a significant mediator. Conclusions: The findings confirmed the mediating role of maladaptive self-blame, rumination, and catastrophizing strategies in the relationship between computer game use disorder and depression, anxiety, and psychological pain. A stronger mediating effect was observed in the case of psychological pain, suggesting the particular importance of maladaptive emotion regulation in the context of intense emotional suffering. These results highlight the need to address self-blame, rumination, and catastrophizing strategies in the treatment of IGD, as well as in the diagnosis and assessment of co-occurring emotional symptoms and suicide risk among gamers. Further exploration of the identified issue is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34766/0wsqte15
Primary Topic
Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maladaptive emotion regulation strategies as mediators in the relationship between gaming disorder and psychological pain, depression, and anxiety

Katarzyna Kucharska, Agnieszka Demianowska, Maria Ryś, Julia Ostęp
Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio
Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
article

Maladaptive emotion regulation strategies as mediators in the relationship between gaming disorder and psychological pain, depression, and anxiety

Katarzyna Kucharska, Agnieszka Demianowska, Maria Ryś, Julia Ostęp
article en

Abstract

Video game use disorder, classified in the ICD-11 as a behavioral addiction (code: 6C51), is characterized by impaired control over gaming, prioritization of gaming over other activities, and continuation despite negative consequences. Affecting an estimated 3.3% of the global population and 3.7% in Poland, it has been linked to symptoms of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress. Individuals struggling with this disorder often exhibit difficulties in emotion regulation, which may lead to the adoption of maladaptive coping strategies such as rumination, self-blame, or catastrophizing. These strategies not only reinforce problematic gaming behaviors as a means of escaping negative emotional states but may also intensify symptoms of mental health issues. The aim of this study was to examine the role of maladaptive emotion regulation strategies in the relationship between video game use disorder and psychological pain, anxiety, and depression. Methods: The study included 201 Polish computer game players who completed five standardized self-report measures: the IGD-20 (symptoms of Internet Gaming Disorder), HADS (symptoms of anxiety and depression), PAS (psychological pain), and the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (KPRE; emotion regulation strategies). Mediation models were analyzed in R (version 4.5.1) using the lavaan package with bootstrap confidence interval estimation (5000 samples, 95% CI). Results: Mediation analysis showed that catastrophizing mediated the relationship between Internet Gaming Disorder and all psychopathological variables. Rumination was a significant mediator only for anxiety, while self-blame mediated the relationship with psychological pain. Blaming others did not serve as a significant mediator. Conclusions: The findings confirmed the mediating role of maladaptive self-blame, rumination, and catastrophizing strategies in the relationship between computer game use disorder and depression, anxiety, and psychological pain. A stronger mediating effect was observed in the case of psychological pain, suggesting the particular importance of maladaptive emotion regulation in the context of intense emotional suffering. These results highlight the need to address self-blame, rumination, and catastrophizing strategies in the treatment of IGD, as well as in the diagnosis and assessment of co-occurring emotional symptoms and suicide risk among gamers. Further exploration of the identified issue is needed.

Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et RatioVol. 63(3)
Uniwersytet SWPS (PL), Institute of Psychology (PL), Institut National de la Statistique (MG), Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.