Locomotor Recovery in Spinal Cord Injury Can Be Assessed Using Weight-Bearing

Spinal cord injury (SCI) can result in partial or full paralysis, depending on the level and completeness of injury. Locomotor function is often used as a measure of recovery and treatment outcomes. The Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan scale and Basso Mouse Scale (BMS) are gold standards used in rodent SCI studies to evaluate changes in locomotor recovery. However, these scoring systems are observer-dependent measures that may be affected by the presence of an experimenter, particularly in studies where blinding is difficult. Observer-independent methods measure outcomes without an operator present, thus reducing bias and increasing reproducibility between research groups. Changes in locomotor recovery were evaluated after contusive SCI using the Advanced Dynamic Weight Bearing (ADWB) system, previously used successfully to assess acute and chronic pain. We observed a shift in body weight early after injury, with increased surface area and weight placement to the front paws and the trunk/tail region. Concurrently, there was a reduction in rear paw surface area and weight placement. As functional recovery occurred over time, there was a shift toward reduced weight placement on the front paws. As with locomotor recovery, these changes did not return to preinjury levels. We also found that the rate and degree to which mice shifted weight onto front paws depended on injury severity. Importantly, changes in weight distribution and surface area showed a strong correlation with BMS scores, suggesting that the observer-independent ADWB test is a viable measure to assess changes in locomotor function over time after SCI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08977151251380704
Primary Topic
Spinal Cord Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Locomotor Recovery in Spinal Cord Injury Can Be Assessed Using Weight-Bearing

Amanda L. Zacharias, Qing Duan, Courtney A. Bannerman, S Philips et al.
Journal of Neurotrauma
Spinal Cord Injury Research
article

Locomotor Recovery in Spinal Cord Injury Can Be Assessed Using Weight-Bearing

Amanda L. Zacharias, Qing Duan, Courtney A. Bannerman, S Philips, Mitra Knezic, Julia P. Segal, Nader Ghasemlou, Drew Harrigan
article en

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) can result in partial or full paralysis, depending on the level and completeness of injury. Locomotor function is often used as a measure of recovery and treatment outcomes. The Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan scale and Basso Mouse Scale (BMS) are gold standards used in rodent SCI studies to evaluate changes in locomotor recovery. However, these scoring systems are observer-dependent measures that may be affected by the presence of an experimenter, particularly in studies where blinding is difficult. Observer-independent methods measure outcomes without an operator present, thus reducing bias and increasing reproducibility between research groups. Changes in locomotor recovery were evaluated after contusive SCI using the Advanced Dynamic Weight Bearing (ADWB) system, previously used successfully to assess acute and chronic pain. We observed a shift in body weight early after injury, with increased surface area and weight placement to the front paws and the trunk/tail region. Concurrently, there was a reduction in rear paw surface area and weight placement. As functional recovery occurred over time, there was a shift toward reduced weight placement on the front paws. As with locomotor recovery, these changes did not return to preinjury levels. We also found that the rate and degree to which mice shifted weight onto front paws depended on injury severity. Importantly, changes in weight distribution and surface area showed a strong correlation with BMS scores, suggesting that the observer-independent ADWB test is a viable measure to assess changes in locomotor function over time after SCI.

Journal of NeurotraumaVol. 42(23-24)
Queen's University (CA), Kingston Health Sciences Centre (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Spinal Cord Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.