Experimental study of different methods for post-processing plastic parts manufactured by 3D printing

The article aims to compare and evaluate methods for surface treatment of plastic products manufactured using 3D printing technology, namely by fused deposition modelling (layer-by-layer FDM). The experimental studies were conducted on ABS plastic samples using various tools for physical, thermal, and chemical processing. These included an electric engraver with coarse and fine grain grinding wheels, a felt polishing wheel and abrasive paste, burrs; acetone, dichloromethane (methylene chloride); a heat gun; a NEJE Master semiconductor laser engraver with adjustable laser power. The study was conducted utilizing portable optical and digital microscopes. The article focuses on the existing methods for surface treatment of ABS plastic products and highlights their advantages and disadvantages. In order to compare the methods of surface treatment of ABS plastic products, a visual assessment of the results of surface treatment by various methods was carried out according to several criteria. We compared the obtained types of surfaces, printer resolution (i. e., layer thickness and X-Y resolution), surface uniformity, degree of deformation, presence of scratches/cracks, cavities, buildups, and blisters employing the proposed criteria. The comparative analysis of various processing methods demonstrated that the best result in terms of quality was achieved with surface treatment using laser radiation. However, this method was shown to have a drawback which is the need for preliminary laser adjustment and the potential complexity of processing three-dimensional parts. The results of the present study can be applied in mechanical engineering when manufacturing parts using additive technologies to manage the surface quality of plastic products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iPolytech Journal
Published
2025-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21285/1814-3520-2025-3-322-335
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental study of different methods for post-processing plastic parts manufactured by 3D printing

Dmitriy Levin, Alexander I. Boldyrev, О.А. Рябинина, M. E. Podshibyakin
iPolytech Journal
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Experimental study of different methods for post-processing plastic parts manufactured by 3D printing

Dmitriy Levin, Alexander I. Boldyrev, О.А. Рябинина, M. E. Podshibyakin
article en

Abstract

The article aims to compare and evaluate methods for surface treatment of plastic products manufactured using 3D printing technology, namely by fused deposition modelling (layer-by-layer FDM). The experimental studies were conducted on ABS plastic samples using various tools for physical, thermal, and chemical processing. These included an electric engraver with coarse and fine grain grinding wheels, a felt polishing wheel and abrasive paste, burrs; acetone, dichloromethane (methylene chloride); a heat gun; a NEJE Master semiconductor laser engraver with adjustable laser power. The study was conducted utilizing portable optical and digital microscopes. The article focuses on the existing methods for surface treatment of ABS plastic products and highlights their advantages and disadvantages. In order to compare the methods of surface treatment of ABS plastic products, a visual assessment of the results of surface treatment by various methods was carried out according to several criteria. We compared the obtained types of surfaces, printer resolution (i. e., layer thickness and X-Y resolution), surface uniformity, degree of deformation, presence of scratches/cracks, cavities, buildups, and blisters employing the proposed criteria. The comparative analysis of various processing methods demonstrated that the best result in terms of quality was achieved with surface treatment using laser radiation. However, this method was shown to have a drawback which is the need for preliminary laser adjustment and the potential complexity of processing three-dimensional parts. The results of the present study can be applied in mechanical engineering when manufacturing parts using additive technologies to manage the surface quality of plastic products.

iPolytech JournalVol. 29(3)
Voronezh State Technical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Experimental study of different methods for post-processing plastic parts manufactured by 3D printing — Dmitriy Levin, Alexander I. Boldyrev, et al. · iPolytech Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS