Effects of Oliceridine Versus Sufentanil on Postoperative Recovery Quality During Hysteroscopy Under Laryngeal Mask Airway Anesthesia: Protocol for a Single-Blind and Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Hysteroscopy, the gold standard for diagnosing and treating intrauterine pathologies, has shown substantial increase in its adoption in clinical practice. Nevertheless, early postoperative pain and opioid-related adverse effects remain critical determinants of recovery quality. Oliceridine—a novel G protein-biased μ-opioid receptor agonist—demonstrates an improved therapeutic range over conventional opioids in preliminary studies. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aims to evaluate whether oliceridine enhances recovery quality while reducing opioid-related complications compared to sufentanil in patients undergoing hysteroscopy under general anesthesia. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> This single-center randomized controlled trial will enroll 120 patients undergoing hysteroscopy under general anesthesia with 1:1 randomization to sufentanil- or oliceridine-based analgesia. The primary outcome is early recovery quality assessed by the 15-item Quality of Recovery scale at 24 hours after the surgery, while secondary outcomes include hemodynamic fluctuations during induction, total intraoperative opioid consumption and supplemental bolus frequency, proportion requiring vasoactive agents, incidence of respiratory depression in postanesthesia care unit, postoperative extubation time, opioid-related adverse events within 24 hours, and Visual Analog Scale pain scores at 30 minutes, 4 hours, 8 hours, and 24 hours postextubation. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> This study received approval from the Medical Ethics Committee of Deyang People’s Hospital, Deyang, China, on April 16, 2025 (approval 2025-03-009-K01). Participant recruitment is anticipated to be completed by December 2025. Data analysis, manuscript preparation, and submission for publication are expected to be completed by February 2026. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> The successful completion of this trial will generate evidence regarding whether oliceridine enhances recovery quality while reducing opioid-related complications compared to sufentanil in patients undergoing hysteroscopy under general anesthesia. </sec> <sec> <title>CLINICALTRIAL</title> Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2500104024; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=275501 </sec> <sec> <title>INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT</title> DERR1-10.2196/84521 </sec>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.84521
Primary Topic
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Oliceridine Versus Sufentanil on Postoperative Recovery Quality During Hysteroscopy Under Laryngeal Mask Airway Anesthesia: Protocol for a Single-Blind and Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

Jiajia Han, Xianjie Zhang, Jianyong Luo, Wenhu Zhai et al.
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
article

Effects of Oliceridine Versus Sufentanil on Postoperative Recovery Quality During Hysteroscopy Under Laryngeal Mask Airway Anesthesia: Protocol for a Single-Blind and Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

Jiajia Han, Xianjie Zhang, Jianyong Luo, Wenhu Zhai, Yu-Hang Shou
article en

Abstract

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Hysteroscopy, the gold standard for diagnosing and treating intrauterine pathologies, has shown substantial increase in its adoption in clinical practice. Nevertheless, early postoperative pain and opioid-related adverse effects remain critical determinants of recovery quality. Oliceridine—a novel G protein-biased μ-opioid receptor agonist—demonstrates an improved therapeutic range over conventional opioids in preliminary studies. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aims to evaluate whether oliceridine enhances recovery quality while reducing opioid-related complications compared to sufentanil in patients undergoing hysteroscopy under general anesthesia. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> This single-center randomized controlled trial will enroll 120 patients undergoing hysteroscopy under general anesthesia with 1:1 randomization to sufentanil- or oliceridine-based analgesia. The primary outcome is early recovery quality assessed by the 15-item Quality of Recovery scale at 24 hours after the surgery, while secondary outcomes include hemodynamic fluctuations during induction, total intraoperative opioid consumption and supplemental bolus frequency, proportion requiring vasoactive agents, incidence of respiratory depression in postanesthesia care unit, postoperative extubation time, opioid-related adverse events within 24 hours, and Visual Analog Scale pain scores at 30 minutes, 4 hours, 8 hours, and 24 hours postextubation. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> This study received approval from the Medical Ethics Committee of Deyang People’s Hospital, Deyang, China, on April 16, 2025 (approval 2025-03-009-K01). Participant recruitment is anticipated to be completed by December 2025. Data analysis, manuscript preparation, and submission for publication are expected to be completed by February 2026. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> The successful completion of this trial will generate evidence regarding whether oliceridine enhances recovery quality while reducing opioid-related complications compared to sufentanil in patients undergoing hysteroscopy under general anesthesia. </sec> <sec> <title>CLINICALTRIAL</title> Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2500104024; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=275501 </sec> <sec> <title>INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT</title> DERR1-10.2196/84521 </sec>

Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.