Developing the Menstrual Myths Attitude Scale

<b>Background:</b> Menstrual myths include practices that negatively impact women's health. Knowing attitudes toward menstrual myths is essential for protecting and improving women's health. However, there are limited measurement tools available to determine attitudes toward menstrual myths. <b>Methods:</b> This study is a methodological scale development study conducted between October 2021 and January 2023 to determine individuals' attitudes towards menstrual myths. For this purpose, the scale items prepared by making use of the literature were shaped with expert opinions, pre-application was made, and data were collected from a total of 337 women through a questionnaire and validity analyses, including exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability analyses (Cronbach's alpha), were also performed. <b>Results:</b> The final version of the scale included 20 items under 5 subscales (menstrual information, menstrual stigmatization, menstrual privacy, menstrual hygiene, menstruation education). Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.79 for the whole scale. EFA revealed five factors explaining 52.074% of the total variance. CFA confirmed a good model fit: χ<sup>2</sup> = 2876.480; df = 496, <i>p</i> < 0.05; X<sup>2</sup>/sd = 1.655; RMSEA = 0.044, AGFI = 0.910, IFI = 0.928, TLI = 0.913, GFI = 0.932, and CFI = 0.927. Cronbach's alpha was 0.790 for the total scale. <b>Conclusions:</b> The Attitude Towards Menstrual Myths scale is a valid and reliable tool for determining women's attitudes toward menstrual myths. It is recommended that further testing be conducted for use by different groups, men and gender-neutral individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182381
Primary Topic
Menstrual Health and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing the Menstrual Myths Attitude Scale

Gülüzar Sade, Metin Yıldız
Healthcare
Menstrual Health and Disorders
article

Developing the Menstrual Myths Attitude Scale

Gülüzar Sade, Metin Yıldız
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Menstrual myths include practices that negatively impact women's health. Knowing attitudes toward menstrual myths is essential for protecting and improving women's health. However, there are limited measurement tools available to determine attitudes toward menstrual myths. <b>Methods:</b> This study is a methodological scale development study conducted between October 2021 and January 2023 to determine individuals' attitudes towards menstrual myths. For this purpose, the scale items prepared by making use of the literature were shaped with expert opinions, pre-application was made, and data were collected from a total of 337 women through a questionnaire and validity analyses, including exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability analyses (Cronbach's alpha), were also performed. <b>Results:</b> The final version of the scale included 20 items under 5 subscales (menstrual information, menstrual stigmatization, menstrual privacy, menstrual hygiene, menstruation education). Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.79 for the whole scale. EFA revealed five factors explaining 52.074% of the total variance. CFA confirmed a good model fit: χ<sup>2</sup> = 2876.480; df = 496, <i>p</i> < 0.05; X<sup>2</sup>/sd = 1.655; RMSEA = 0.044, AGFI = 0.910, IFI = 0.928, TLI = 0.913, GFI = 0.932, and CFI = 0.927. Cronbach's alpha was 0.790 for the total scale. <b>Conclusions:</b> The Attitude Towards Menstrual Myths scale is a valid and reliable tool for determining women's attitudes toward menstrual myths. It is recommended that further testing be conducted for use by different groups, men and gender-neutral individuals.

HealthcareVol. 13(18)
Sakarya University (TR), Tarsus University (TR)
Sakarya Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Menstrual Health and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.