Mammographic Calcifications in Lung Transplant Recipients: Prevalence and Evolution

<b>Objective:</b> To investigate the prevalence and progression of macrocalcifications or sporadic scattered microcalcifications, breast arterial calcifications (BAC) and grouped microcalcifications in women undergoing lung transplantation (LTX). <b>Materials and Methods:</b> In this retrospective single-center cohort study, 176 adult female patients who underwent mammography between 2008 and 2025 were included: 82 LTX recipients and 94 age-matched controls. Mammographic findings were assessed using standardized BI-RADS criteria and a visual BAC scoring system. Clinical and demographic data were extracted from electronic medical records. Multivariable logistic regression and cumulative incidence analysis were used to evaluate associations and progression patterns. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Fleiss' kappa. <b>Results:</b> BAC and grouped microcalcifications were significantly more prevalent in the LTX group in the last mammography (BAC: OR 6.57, 95% CI 2.34-20.7; microcalcifications: OR 14.6, 95% CI 3.93-73.9; both <i>p</i> < 0.001). Cumulative incidence analysis showed accelerated progression of BAC and grouped microcalcifications in LTX recipients (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.01), while macrocalcifications or sporadic scattered microcalcification progression did not differ significantly. BAC was often more extensive and potentially mimicked malignant findings. Interobserver agreement was highest for the four-level BAC scoring system (κ = 0.61), followed by BAC presence (κ = 0.59) and macrocalcifications (κ = 0.51), while grouped microcalcifications showed only fair agreement (κ = 0.33). <b>Conclusions:</b> Lung transplant recipients demonstrate significantly higher prevalence and faster progression of BAC and grouped microcalcifications compared to controls, complicating mammographic interpretation. Given their elevated risk of aggressive malignancies and diagnostic overlap between benign and suspicious calcifications, transplant recipients may benefit from tailored screening strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13092318
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mammographic Calcifications in Lung Transplant Recipients: Prevalence and Evolution

Thomas Frauenfelder, Jonathan A. Saenger, Caroline Maier, Denise Bos et al.
1 citations
Biomedicines
Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.05
article

Mammographic Calcifications in Lung Transplant Recipients: Prevalence and Evolution

Thomas Frauenfelder, Jonathan A. Saenger, Caroline Maier, Denise Bos, Andreas Boss, Bjarne Kerber, Ela Uenal, Jasmin Happe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> To investigate the prevalence and progression of macrocalcifications or sporadic scattered microcalcifications, breast arterial calcifications (BAC) and grouped microcalcifications in women undergoing lung transplantation (LTX). <b>Materials and Methods:</b> In this retrospective single-center cohort study, 176 adult female patients who underwent mammography between 2008 and 2025 were included: 82 LTX recipients and 94 age-matched controls. Mammographic findings were assessed using standardized BI-RADS criteria and a visual BAC scoring system. Clinical and demographic data were extracted from electronic medical records. Multivariable logistic regression and cumulative incidence analysis were used to evaluate associations and progression patterns. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Fleiss' kappa. <b>Results:</b> BAC and grouped microcalcifications were significantly more prevalent in the LTX group in the last mammography (BAC: OR 6.57, 95% CI 2.34-20.7; microcalcifications: OR 14.6, 95% CI 3.93-73.9; both <i>p</i> < 0.001). Cumulative incidence analysis showed accelerated progression of BAC and grouped microcalcifications in LTX recipients (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.01), while macrocalcifications or sporadic scattered microcalcification progression did not differ significantly. BAC was often more extensive and potentially mimicked malignant findings. Interobserver agreement was highest for the four-level BAC scoring system (κ = 0.61), followed by BAC presence (κ = 0.59) and macrocalcifications (κ = 0.51), while grouped microcalcifications showed only fair agreement (κ = 0.33). <b>Conclusions:</b> Lung transplant recipients demonstrate significantly higher prevalence and faster progression of BAC and grouped microcalcifications compared to controls, complicating mammographic interpretation. Given their elevated risk of aggressive malignancies and diagnostic overlap between benign and suspicious calcifications, transplant recipients may benefit from tailored screening strategies.

BiomedicinesVol. 13(9)
University Hospital of Zurich (CH), GZO Spital Wetzikon (CH), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.