SYSTEM FOR IMPROVING THE TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PEDAGOGICAL DISCIPLINES IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION

The article is devoted to the exploration and clarification of the structural components of the system for improving the teaching of psychological and pedagogical disciplines in higher education establishments of Ukraine within national, regional, and individual needs-based dimensions. The phenomenon of enhancing the psychological and pedagogical training of future specialists is revealed through the lens of key methodological approaches relevant to the study (holistic, systemic, subject-oriented, cultural, personal, activity-based, etc.). The system is built on the basis of the leading conceptual ideas: 1. The definition of the system structure is derived from taking into account the needs for: 1) achieving its status as a holistic system in the context of acquiring specific holistic properties and the ability to function at different levels in accordance with the strategic long-term goals of social, regional, and personal development; 2) transforming interdependent movements towards the subjectivity of the entire institution, department, teacher, and student into key guidelines for improving the varieties of their specific activities related to the renewal of psychological and pedagogical education; 3) establishing innovation as the highest-priority direction for increasing the efficiency of the departments of pedagogy and psychology; 4) motivating and organizing, by a higher education teacher, the varieties of student self-activity as a leading means of their personal and professional development; 5) updating scientific ideas about the personal and professional self-development of a future specialist. 2. The leading regulatory principles for developing the value-content aspect of the system’s components are two requirements: 1) the principle of expanding the content from general professional psychopedagogical to professional and narrowly specialized; 2) the principle of structuring it in a way that ensures both integration and differentiation. 3. The priority characteristic of the technologies used in teaching psychological and pedagogical disciplines is holistic and developmental. The following structural components and elements of a multi-level system as a special integrity are revealed: 1) at the level of the entire system: target (strategic long-term goals in the national-need and regional-need dimensions); 2) at the level of a higher educational establishment: institutional-transformative (elements: conceptual-target; program-modernization); 3) at the level of the department: activity-innovative (elements: goal-setting; value-content; technological-methodological); 4) at the level of the teacher’s personality: managerial-self-activity-based (elements: self-management; motivational; organizational-self-activity-based; stimulating; monitoring); 5) at the level of the student's personality: personal and professional self-developmental (elements: value-motivational; cognitive-developmental; affective-self-regulatory; communicative-reflective).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ТHE SOURCES OF PEDAGOGICAL SKILLS
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33989/2075-146x.2025.36.339444
Primary Topic
Innovative Educational Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SYSTEM FOR IMPROVING THE TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PEDAGOGICAL DISCIPLINES IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION

Oleksandr Kucheriavyi
ТHE SOURCES OF PEDAGOGICAL SKILLS
Innovative Educational Technologies
article

SYSTEM FOR IMPROVING THE TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PEDAGOGICAL DISCIPLINES IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION

Oleksandr Kucheriavyi
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the exploration and clarification of the structural components of the system for improving the teaching of psychological and pedagogical disciplines in higher education establishments of Ukraine within national, regional, and individual needs-based dimensions. The phenomenon of enhancing the psychological and pedagogical training of future specialists is revealed through the lens of key methodological approaches relevant to the study (holistic, systemic, subject-oriented, cultural, personal, activity-based, etc.). The system is built on the basis of the leading conceptual ideas: 1. The definition of the system structure is derived from taking into account the needs for: 1) achieving its status as a holistic system in the context of acquiring specific holistic properties and the ability to function at different levels in accordance with the strategic long-term goals of social, regional, and personal development; 2) transforming interdependent movements towards the subjectivity of the entire institution, department, teacher, and student into key guidelines for improving the varieties of their specific activities related to the renewal of psychological and pedagogical education; 3) establishing innovation as the highest-priority direction for increasing the efficiency of the departments of pedagogy and psychology; 4) motivating and organizing, by a higher education teacher, the varieties of student self-activity as a leading means of their personal and professional development; 5) updating scientific ideas about the personal and professional self-development of a future specialist. 2. The leading regulatory principles for developing the value-content aspect of the system’s components are two requirements: 1) the principle of expanding the content from general professional psychopedagogical to professional and narrowly specialized; 2) the principle of structuring it in a way that ensures both integration and differentiation. 3. The priority characteristic of the technologies used in teaching psychological and pedagogical disciplines is holistic and developmental. The following structural components and elements of a multi-level system as a special integrity are revealed: 1) at the level of the entire system: target (strategic long-term goals in the national-need and regional-need dimensions); 2) at the level of a higher educational establishment: institutional-transformative (elements: conceptual-target; program-modernization); 3) at the level of the department: activity-innovative (elements: goal-setting; value-content; technological-methodological); 4) at the level of the teacher’s personality: managerial-self-activity-based (elements: self-management; motivational; organizational-self-activity-based; stimulating; monitoring); 5) at the level of the student's personality: personal and professional self-developmental (elements: value-motivational; cognitive-developmental; affective-self-regulatory; communicative-reflective).

ТHE SOURCES OF PEDAGOGICAL SKILLS(36)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Innovative Educational Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.