Strength in Numbers: How Variation in Party Size Impacts the Origins, Evolution, and Durability of Communist Regimes

This article proceeds from a novel empirical finding: namely, there is substantial divergence in the size of the communist party between two subtypes of communist autocracies (revolutionary vs. nonrevolutionary regimes). The communist party is small at the moment of the seizure of power in the revolutionary dictatorships (e.g., China) and remains relatively small throughout their lifespan. By contrast, in the nonrevolutionary subtype (e.g., Bulgaria) the communist party is large at the time of regime inception and remains so throughout the lifespan of the dictatorship. The article identifies the precommunist historical antecedents of this variation and offers an explanation of its effects, linking the divergence in party size to variation in outcomes of central theoretical interest to students of authoritarianism, such as regime origins, regime evolution, and regime durability. The article is based on an original communist party dataset constructed from qualitative corpora of archival materials, supplemented with relevant secondary sources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Political Studies
Published
2025-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140251381735
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strength in Numbers: How Variation in Party Size Impacts the Origins, Evolution, and Durability of Communist Regimes

Martin K. Dimitrov
Comparative Political Studies
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Strength in Numbers: How Variation in Party Size Impacts the Origins, Evolution, and Durability of Communist Regimes

Martin K. Dimitrov
article en

Abstract

This article proceeds from a novel empirical finding: namely, there is substantial divergence in the size of the communist party between two subtypes of communist autocracies (revolutionary vs. nonrevolutionary regimes). The communist party is small at the moment of the seizure of power in the revolutionary dictatorships (e.g., China) and remains relatively small throughout their lifespan. By contrast, in the nonrevolutionary subtype (e.g., Bulgaria) the communist party is large at the time of regime inception and remains so throughout the lifespan of the dictatorship. The article identifies the precommunist historical antecedents of this variation and offers an explanation of its effects, linking the divergence in party size to variation in outcomes of central theoretical interest to students of authoritarianism, such as regime origins, regime evolution, and regime durability. The article is based on an original communist party dataset constructed from qualitative corpora of archival materials, supplemented with relevant secondary sources.

Comparative Political Studies
Tulane University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Strength in Numbers: How Variation in Party Size Impacts the Origins, Evolution, and Durability of Communist Regimes — Martin K. Dimitrov · Comparative Political Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS