The Role of Daily Calls to Telephone Companionship Lines for Older Adults Experiencing Chronic Loneliness

This study uses mixed methods to understand the experiences of daily versus nondaily callers to a telephone-based companionship line, the Institute on Aging Friendship Line, for loneliness. Baseline interviews of Friendship Line participants (n = 63) were conducted between October 1st, 2020, and April 30th, 2021, with follow-up interviews at 3 and 6 months. We tested the association of call volume (daily vs. nondaily) with chronic loneliness, defined as scoring 6+ points on the 3-item UCLA Scale (Range: 3-9 points) at two or more time points. In addition, we analyzed qualitative interviews of a purposive sample (n = 23) thematically. Daily callers were more likely to be chronically lonely than nondaily callers (61% vs. 18%, χ<sup>2</sup> (1) = 11.5, p<0.001). Although daily callers reported high levels of chronic loneliness, they reported high satisfaction with and meaningful relationships through the Friendship Line (daily: 83% vs. nondaily: 61%, χ<sup>2</sup> (1) = 2.9, p = 0.09). Daily callers described the importance of a long-term, evolving relationship with Friendship Line, whereas nondaily callers described the Friendship Line as an outlet for acute social needs, similar to an urgent care clinic. Taken together, results suggest the Friendship Line is an important source of support for older adults managing both chronic loneliness and occasional loneliness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.70058
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Daily Calls to Telephone Companionship Lines for Older Adults Experiencing Chronic Loneliness

Ashwin Kotwal, Danielle P. Escueta, Soe Han Tha, Katrina Hough et al.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Health disparities and outcomes
article

The Role of Daily Calls to Telephone Companionship Lines for Older Adults Experiencing Chronic Loneliness

Ashwin Kotwal, Danielle P. Escueta, Soe Han Tha, Katrina Hough, Carla Perissinotto, Preston Burnes
article en

Abstract

This study uses mixed methods to understand the experiences of daily versus nondaily callers to a telephone-based companionship line, the Institute on Aging Friendship Line, for loneliness. Baseline interviews of Friendship Line participants (n = 63) were conducted between October 1st, 2020, and April 30th, 2021, with follow-up interviews at 3 and 6 months. We tested the association of call volume (daily vs. nondaily) with chronic loneliness, defined as scoring 6+ points on the 3-item UCLA Scale (Range: 3-9 points) at two or more time points. In addition, we analyzed qualitative interviews of a purposive sample (n = 23) thematically. Daily callers were more likely to be chronically lonely than nondaily callers (61% vs. 18%, χ<sup>2</sup> (1) = 11.5, p<0.001). Although daily callers reported high levels of chronic loneliness, they reported high satisfaction with and meaningful relationships through the Friendship Line (daily: 83% vs. nondaily: 61%, χ<sup>2</sup> (1) = 2.9, p = 0.09). Daily callers described the importance of a long-term, evolving relationship with Friendship Line, whereas nondaily callers described the Friendship Line as an outlet for acute social needs, similar to an urgent care clinic. Taken together, results suggest the Friendship Line is an important source of support for older adults managing both chronic loneliness and occasional loneliness.

Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesVol. 1553(1)
San Francisco VA Medical Center (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Institute on Aging (US), Friendship House (US), Friends Research Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.