Perspective: The Clinical Use of Polygenic Risk Scores: Race, Ethnicity, and Health Disparities.

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are an emerging precision medicine tool based on multiple gene variants that, taken alone, have weak associations with disease risks, but collectively may enhance disease predictive value in the population. However, the benefit of PRS may not be equal among non-European populations, as they are under-represented in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) that serve as the basis for PRS development. In this perspective, we discuss a path forward, which includes: 1) inclusion of underrepresented populations in PRS research; 2) global efforts to build capacity for genomic research; 3) equitable implementation of these tools in clinical practice; and 4) traditional public health approaches to reduce risk of adverse health outcomes as an important component to precision health. As precision medicine is implemented in clinical care, researchers must ensure that advances from PRS research will benefit all.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/ykys-s150
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspective: The Clinical Use of Polygenic Risk Scores: Race, Ethnicity, and Health Disparities.

George A. Mensah, Megan C. Roberts, Muin J. Khoury
UNC Libraries
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

Perspective: The Clinical Use of Polygenic Risk Scores: Race, Ethnicity, and Health Disparities.

George A. Mensah, Megan C. Roberts, Muin J. Khoury
article en

Abstract

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are an emerging precision medicine tool based on multiple gene variants that, taken alone, have weak associations with disease risks, but collectively may enhance disease predictive value in the population. However, the benefit of PRS may not be equal among non-European populations, as they are under-represented in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) that serve as the basis for PRS development. In this perspective, we discuss a path forward, which includes: 1) inclusion of underrepresented populations in PRS research; 2) global efforts to build capacity for genomic research; 3) equitable implementation of these tools in clinical practice; and 4) traditional public health approaches to reduce risk of adverse health outcomes as an important component to precision health. As precision medicine is implemented in clinical care, researchers must ensure that advances from PRS research will benefit all.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perspective: The Clinical Use of Polygenic Risk Scores: Race, Ethnicity, and Health Disparities. — George A. Mensah, Megan C. Roberts, et al. · UNC Libraries (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS