Gerontologists combating fraudulent research participants: recommendations from design to dissemination

This article provides comprehensive guidance for gerontological researchers on preventing and identifying fraudulent research participants-from study design through dissemination. Drawing from our own experiences with identified fraudulent participants, we highlight the complex and often financially motivated nature of participant misrepresentation. These experiences inform our broad recommendations for researchers, funding bodies, and academic institutions, emphasizing protocol design focused on early detection of fraudulent participants including verification processes and proactive measures to uphold study integrity. Key recommendations include requiring a fraudulent participant detection plan in grant applications, training peer reviewers and research teams, and implementing regular data checks. We also discuss the importance of collaboration with Institutional Review Board representatives, funders, universities, and professional organizations who uphold scientific integrity of research accompanied by the dissemination of experiences to educate the scientific community. By normalizing the expectation of fraud and addressing it at multiple levels, we aim to enhance the reliability and trustworthiness of gerontological research. This article serves as a valuable resource for researchers to safeguard their studies against fraudulent activities and maintain the credibility of their data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Gerontologist
Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf206
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gerontologists combating fraudulent research participants: recommendations from design to dissemination

Justine S. Sefcik, Jeffrey T. Boon, Cara Wallace, Harleah G. Buck et al.
The Gerontologist
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Gerontologists combating fraudulent research participants: recommendations from design to dissemination

Justine S. Sefcik, Jeffrey T. Boon, Cara Wallace, Harleah G. Buck, Joan G. Carpenter, Erica Frechman
article en

Abstract

This article provides comprehensive guidance for gerontological researchers on preventing and identifying fraudulent research participants-from study design through dissemination. Drawing from our own experiences with identified fraudulent participants, we highlight the complex and often financially motivated nature of participant misrepresentation. These experiences inform our broad recommendations for researchers, funding bodies, and academic institutions, emphasizing protocol design focused on early detection of fraudulent participants including verification processes and proactive measures to uphold study integrity. Key recommendations include requiring a fraudulent participant detection plan in grant applications, training peer reviewers and research teams, and implementing regular data checks. We also discuss the importance of collaboration with Institutional Review Board representatives, funders, universities, and professional organizations who uphold scientific integrity of research accompanied by the dissemination of experiences to educate the scientific community. By normalizing the expectation of fraud and addressing it at multiple levels, we aim to enhance the reliability and trustworthiness of gerontological research. This article serves as a valuable resource for researchers to safeguard their studies against fraudulent activities and maintain the credibility of their data.

The GerontologistVol. 65(12)
University of Iowa (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Saint Louis University (ES), Wake Forest University (US), Saint Louis University (US), The Ohio State University (US), University of Baltimore (US), Drexel University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.