Enhancing accuracy: point-of-care ultrasound for rapid confirmation of central line placement in neonates—an observational study

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound against single or multiple check X-rays done to confirm central line position. This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit from March 2023 to March 2024. Point-of-care Ultrasound (USG) and radiograph were performed on infants who underwent central line placement. Diagnostic accuracy of USG was presented by sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio. Of the 160 central lines, 109 (68.1%) vs. 102(63.8%) central lines were defined as optimally placed on the radiograph and POCUS, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of POCUS in confirming central line tip position were 93.58% and82.35%, respectively. The positive predictive value and the negative predictive value were 91.89% and 85.71%, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 5.3%, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.08%. Overall accuracy of POCUS to radiography was 90% [95% confidence interval (CI) 84.27-94.18]. The study also revealed that a significantly shorter time was required in bedside POCUS with a mean duration of 4 minutes as compared to X-ray where the mean duration was 19 minutes. Point-of-care ultrasound can be used as an alternative to bedside radiographic examination in confirming the catheter tip position with diagnostic accuracy of 90%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmaf037
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing accuracy: point-of-care ultrasound for rapid confirmation of central line placement in neonates—an observational study

Anju Bhatia, Manika Chhabra, Madhu Mathur, Arjun Prasad Verma et al.
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
article

Enhancing accuracy: point-of-care ultrasound for rapid confirmation of central line placement in neonates—an observational study

Anju Bhatia, Manika Chhabra, Madhu Mathur, Arjun Prasad Verma, Sourabh Singh, Jyoti More Dhage
article en

Abstract

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound against single or multiple check X-rays done to confirm central line position. This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit from March 2023 to March 2024. Point-of-care Ultrasound (USG) and radiograph were performed on infants who underwent central line placement. Diagnostic accuracy of USG was presented by sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio. Of the 160 central lines, 109 (68.1%) vs. 102(63.8%) central lines were defined as optimally placed on the radiograph and POCUS, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of POCUS in confirming central line tip position were 93.58% and82.35%, respectively. The positive predictive value and the negative predictive value were 91.89% and 85.71%, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 5.3%, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.08%. Overall accuracy of POCUS to radiography was 90% [95% confidence interval (CI) 84.27-94.18]. The study also revealed that a significantly shorter time was required in bedside POCUS with a mean duration of 4 minutes as compared to X-ray where the mean duration was 19 minutes. Point-of-care ultrasound can be used as an alternative to bedside radiographic examination in confirming the catheter tip position with diagnostic accuracy of 90%.

Journal of Tropical PediatricsVol. 71(5)
Gandhi Medical College & Hospital (IN), Mahatma Gandhi Dental College & Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.