Permutation tests to assess sex differences in omics data

It is common to sex-stratify analyses of omics data and to report effects as 'sex-specific' when they are significant in only one sex. However, when analysing hundreds or thousands of molecules, this approach will yield many spurious 'sex-specific' effects if not supported by significant interactions. I illustrate this problem using an RNA sequencing dataset showing almost no significant sex by treatment interactions, but where sex-stratified analyses yield hundreds of 'sex-specific' effects of treatment. These 'sex-specific' effects could be spurious or could be real but not show interactions due to low statistical power. To distinguish these possibilities, I describe permutation tests, which provide an intuitive way to determine if a pattern of observations differs from what would be expected due to chance. For this dataset, assigning sex at random often generates more 'sex-specific' effects than the real data, demonstrating that there is little evidence of sex differences. Next, I simulate an RNA sequencing dataset that includes genes modelled to have sex-specific effects of a condition. As expected, analysis of this simulated dataset yields both significant interactions and sex-specific effects in sex-stratified analyses. While stratified analyses detect a higher number of sex-specific effects than the analysis of interactions, they erroneously identify genes not modelled to show sex-specific effects more often than interactions. A permutation test confirms that the number of sex-specific effects observed in the simulated dataset is greater than expected due to chance. Permutation tests can be applied to omics studies of sex differences, simultaneously providing (i) a clear and simple demonstration of the problems of sex-stratified analyses, and (ii) additional evidence of sex-specific effects where these are present. R code is provided for permutations, simulations, and plots to visualize potential sex-specific effects, which can be adapted to other types of data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Human Reproduction
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gaaf047
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Permutation tests to assess sex differences in omics data

Julian K. Christians
1 citations
Molecular Human Reproduction
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
0.81
article

Permutation tests to assess sex differences in omics data

Julian K. Christians
article en
1 citations

Abstract

It is common to sex-stratify analyses of omics data and to report effects as 'sex-specific' when they are significant in only one sex. However, when analysing hundreds or thousands of molecules, this approach will yield many spurious 'sex-specific' effects if not supported by significant interactions. I illustrate this problem using an RNA sequencing dataset showing almost no significant sex by treatment interactions, but where sex-stratified analyses yield hundreds of 'sex-specific' effects of treatment. These 'sex-specific' effects could be spurious or could be real but not show interactions due to low statistical power. To distinguish these possibilities, I describe permutation tests, which provide an intuitive way to determine if a pattern of observations differs from what would be expected due to chance. For this dataset, assigning sex at random often generates more 'sex-specific' effects than the real data, demonstrating that there is little evidence of sex differences. Next, I simulate an RNA sequencing dataset that includes genes modelled to have sex-specific effects of a condition. As expected, analysis of this simulated dataset yields both significant interactions and sex-specific effects in sex-stratified analyses. While stratified analyses detect a higher number of sex-specific effects than the analysis of interactions, they erroneously identify genes not modelled to show sex-specific effects more often than interactions. A permutation test confirms that the number of sex-specific effects observed in the simulated dataset is greater than expected due to chance. Permutation tests can be applied to omics studies of sex differences, simultaneously providing (i) a clear and simple demonstration of the problems of sex-stratified analyses, and (ii) additional evidence of sex-specific effects where these are present. R code is provided for permutations, simulations, and plots to visualize potential sex-specific effects, which can be adapted to other types of data.

Molecular Human ReproductionVol. 31(3)
Simon Fraser University (CA), Women's Health Research Institute (CA), BC Children's Hospital (CA), B.C. Women's Hospital & Health Centre (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.