Nonconscious processing of fearful and neutral faces modulates the N170
Prioritised processing of fearful compared to neutral faces is reflected in event-related potentials (ERPs), but the extent to which fearful faces enhance ERPs when not consciously perceived remains debated. The N170 component is considered a key marker of nonconscious processing of fearful faces. In this pre-registered study (N = 62), we tested whether the P1, N170, and early posterior negativity (EPN) differentiated between fearful faces, neutral faces, and non-facial control stimuli. Consciousness was manipulated using backward-masked stimuli presented for 17 ms, with masks following immediately or after 200 ms. Participants rated their subjective perception on a perceptual awareness scale in each trial. We found strong evidence for an increased N170 response to nonconscious fearful versus neutral faces and for N170 differences between nonconscious faces and non-facial stimuli. No significant effects were found for P1 or EPN amplitudes in nonconscious conditions, although exploratory analyses suggest a possible P1 difference between faces and non-faces. These findings support that non-conscious emotion and face processing are detectable in early neural responses, albeit much weaker than during conscious perception. Future research should examine the influence of low-level stimulus differences and experimental conditions on these results.
Authors
- Sebastian Schindler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-5431)
- Jens Bölte (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8128-0520)
- Thomas Straube
- Torge Dellert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7475-7474)
- Maximilian Bruchmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8897-1252)
- Pia Breitwieser
- Lynn Tilly
Institutions
- University of Münster (DE)
- Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaf095
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Face Recognition and Perception
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.86