Perceived barriers to ChatGPT integration in Islamic studies education

This study explores the factors that limit Malaysian international students’ interest in using ChatGPT as a learning tool for Islamic Studies in Indonesia. Employing a qualitative narrative inquiry design, data were collected through in-depth interviews with students who possess Islamic educational backgrounds. The findings indicate three key barriers. First, participants perceive ChatGPT as lacking scholarly authority and a valid chain of transmission (sanad), which is essential in legitimizing religious knowledge. Second, students reported concerns about the tool’s limited ability to present accurate and contextualized religious evidence (dalil), requiring further verification from trusted sources. Third, apprehension arose regarding potential distortions in interpreting the Quran and Hadith, as proper exegesis requires mastery of Arabic, a thorough understanding of historical context, and adherence to established methodologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Students
Published
2025-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32674/h99a4p06
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceived barriers to ChatGPT integration in Islamic studies education

Aji Sofanudin, Darmuin Darmuin, Muhammad Anas Ma`arif, Darnoto Darnoto
Journal of International Students
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Perceived barriers to ChatGPT integration in Islamic studies education

Aji Sofanudin, Darmuin Darmuin, Muhammad Anas Ma`arif, Darnoto Darnoto
article en

Abstract

This study explores the factors that limit Malaysian international students’ interest in using ChatGPT as a learning tool for Islamic Studies in Indonesia. Employing a qualitative narrative inquiry design, data were collected through in-depth interviews with students who possess Islamic educational backgrounds. The findings indicate three key barriers. First, participants perceive ChatGPT as lacking scholarly authority and a valid chain of transmission (sanad), which is essential in legitimizing religious knowledge. Second, students reported concerns about the tool’s limited ability to present accurate and contextualized religious evidence (dalil), requiring further verification from trusted sources. Third, apprehension arose regarding potential distortions in interpreting the Quran and Hadith, as proper exegesis requires mastery of Arabic, a thorough understanding of historical context, and adherence to established methodologies.

Journal of International StudentsVol. 15(11)
Walisongo State Islamic University (ID), National Research and Innovation Agency (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perceived barriers to ChatGPT integration in Islamic studies education — Aji Sofanudin, Darmuin Darmuin, et al. · Journal of International Students (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS