Application of (quantitative) structure–activity relationship models for screening of sea-dumped munition and related chemicals detected in environmental samples

Following World Wars I and II, extensive dumping of conventional and chemical munitions in the marine environment has left a lasting impact on coastal areas, particularly those directly involved in the conflicts. Over the decades, corrosion of munition shells has resulted in the release and subsequent detection of a range of hazardous chemicals in environmental samples. These include conventional explosives and related compounds (E&RC), as well as chemical warfare agents and related compounds (CWA&RC). Despite this legacy, significant data gaps persist concerning the persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity of these chemicals to human and environmental health. In this study, we applied an updated and expanded suite of (quantitative) structure-activity relationship, or (Q)SAR, tools-Ecological Structure-Activity Relationships Program Version 2.2, Estimation Program Interface Suite Version 4.11, and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (Q)SAR Toolbox Version 4.5-to comprehensively and simultaneously screen and prioritize a broad range of E&RC and CWA&RC detected in environmental samples from global munition dumpsites. To our knowledge, this is the first application of this combined, up-to-date toolchain to field-detected munition compounds. Our results demonstrate that (Q)SAR models can generate conservative estimations useful for the prioritization of munition-related chemicals for further investigation, although the reliability for specific endpoints may vary by the available empirical data. We underline that trinitrotoluene and its metabolites, followed by tetryl and picric acid (all E&RC), require urgent monitoring in the environment and seafood, alongside defined human health safety thresholds in key exposure sources. In addition, sulfur mustard, arsenical CWA, and their metabolites should be prioritized for targeted human health and long-term environmental studies. This comprehensive screening approach addresses long-standing data gaps, providing a valuable framework for decision makers engaged in the management and remediation of munition dumpsites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf232
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of (quantitative) structure–activity relationship models for screening of sea-dumped munition and related chemicals detected in environmental samples

Taejun Han, João Barbosa, Colin Janssen, Jihae Park et al.
2 citations
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
2.40
article

Application of (quantitative) structure–activity relationship models for screening of sea-dumped munition and related chemicals detected in environmental samples

Taejun Han, João Barbosa, Colin Janssen, Jihae Park, Jana Asselman, Hojun Lee
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Following World Wars I and II, extensive dumping of conventional and chemical munitions in the marine environment has left a lasting impact on coastal areas, particularly those directly involved in the conflicts. Over the decades, corrosion of munition shells has resulted in the release and subsequent detection of a range of hazardous chemicals in environmental samples. These include conventional explosives and related compounds (E&RC), as well as chemical warfare agents and related compounds (CWA&RC). Despite this legacy, significant data gaps persist concerning the persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity of these chemicals to human and environmental health. In this study, we applied an updated and expanded suite of (quantitative) structure-activity relationship, or (Q)SAR, tools-Ecological Structure-Activity Relationships Program Version 2.2, Estimation Program Interface Suite Version 4.11, and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (Q)SAR Toolbox Version 4.5-to comprehensively and simultaneously screen and prioritize a broad range of E&RC and CWA&RC detected in environmental samples from global munition dumpsites. To our knowledge, this is the first application of this combined, up-to-date toolchain to field-detected munition compounds. Our results demonstrate that (Q)SAR models can generate conservative estimations useful for the prioritization of munition-related chemicals for further investigation, although the reliability for specific endpoints may vary by the available empirical data. We underline that trinitrotoluene and its metabolites, followed by tetryl and picric acid (all E&RC), require urgent monitoring in the environment and seafood, alongside defined human health safety thresholds in key exposure sources. In addition, sulfur mustard, arsenical CWA, and their metabolites should be prioritized for targeted human health and long-term environmental studies. This comprehensive screening approach addresses long-standing data gaps, providing a valuable framework for decision makers engaged in the management and remediation of munition dumpsites.

Environmental Toxicology and ChemistryVol. 44(12)
Ghent University (BE), Ghent University Global Campus (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
2.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.