Competing logics and organisational barriers to equality work at universities

Much has been written about the negative impacts of managerialism, bureaucracy and neoliberalism on education, students and staff. This article demonstrates that these structures are also holding back progress on equality. The article provides an analysis of interviews with 14 university employees about their involvement in closing Global Ethnic Majority awarding gaps in the UK, and highlights the presence of competing autonomous, utilitarian and managerial logics. The article identifies challenges that these competing logics create and concludes by recommending that leaders and managers understand and accept the presence of multiple logics in their institutions and provide more accommodating management approaches. Many university employees will not be motivated to engage in equality work by managerial or utilitarian logic, and university leaders would benefit from developing a better understanding and appreciation of other logics, which we argue is essential for equality work to flourish and achieve its aims.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080x.2025.2555631
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Competing logics and organisational barriers to equality work at universities

Aura Lehtonen, Carl Mallett, Siobhan Dytham
1 citations
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
Gender Diversity and Inequality
3.87
article

Competing logics and organisational barriers to equality work at universities

Aura Lehtonen, Carl Mallett, Siobhan Dytham
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Much has been written about the negative impacts of managerialism, bureaucracy and neoliberalism on education, students and staff. This article demonstrates that these structures are also holding back progress on equality. The article provides an analysis of interviews with 14 university employees about their involvement in closing Global Ethnic Majority awarding gaps in the UK, and highlights the presence of competing autonomous, utilitarian and managerial logics. The article identifies challenges that these competing logics create and concludes by recommending that leaders and managers understand and accept the presence of multiple logics in their institutions and provide more accommodating management approaches. Many university employees will not be motivated to engage in equality work by managerial or utilitarian logic, and university leaders would benefit from developing a better understanding and appreciation of other logics, which we argue is essential for equality work to flourish and achieve its aims.

Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
University of Northampton (GB), University of Greenwich (GB), Coventry University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.