An Ambidirectional Cohort Evaluation of Soft Tissue and Dentoalveolar Changes after Orthodontic Treatment with Bimaxillary Distalization vs First Premolar Extraction

To extract or not to extract has always been a dilemma orthodontists face, especially in borderline cases. The advent of extraradicular screws has largely simplified this problem since full arch distalization is now possible. This approach is particularly beneficial for patients hesitant about extractions or when extractions might undesirably flatten the facial profile. Considering the dearth of evidence, this study was taken up to compare treatment outcomes of a conventional premolar extraction approach vs a non-extraction approach with full arch distalization. The findings offer valuable insights for practitioners to make evidence-based treatment decisions. How to cite this article: Sanman R, Desai A, Natarajan S, <i>et al</i>. An Ambidirectional Cohort Evaluation of Soft Tissue and Dentoalveolar Changes after Orthodontic Treatment with Bimaxillary Distalization vs First Premolar Extraction. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(7):699-704.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3915
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Ambidirectional Cohort Evaluation of Soft Tissue and Dentoalveolar Changes after Orthodontic Treatment with Bimaxillary Distalization vs First Premolar Extraction

Mranali Shetty, Srikant Natarajan, Rashmi Sanman
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

An Ambidirectional Cohort Evaluation of Soft Tissue and Dentoalveolar Changes after Orthodontic Treatment with Bimaxillary Distalization vs First Premolar Extraction

Mranali Shetty, Srikant Natarajan, Rashmi Sanman
article en

Abstract

To extract or not to extract has always been a dilemma orthodontists face, especially in borderline cases. The advent of extraradicular screws has largely simplified this problem since full arch distalization is now possible. This approach is particularly beneficial for patients hesitant about extractions or when extractions might undesirably flatten the facial profile. Considering the dearth of evidence, this study was taken up to compare treatment outcomes of a conventional premolar extraction approach vs a non-extraction approach with full arch distalization. The findings offer valuable insights for practitioners to make evidence-based treatment decisions. How to cite this article: Sanman R, Desai A, Natarajan S, <i>et al</i>. An Ambidirectional Cohort Evaluation of Soft Tissue and Dentoalveolar Changes after Orthodontic Treatment with Bimaxillary Distalization vs First Premolar Extraction. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(7):699-704.

The Journal of Contemporary Dental PracticeVol. 26(7)
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.