Validity of Clinical Diagnostic Signs in the Examination of Individuals Suspected of Temporomandibular Disorders Using the Hamburg Protocol

Purpose. To determine the validity of clinical diagnostic signs in the examination of individuals suspected of temporomandibular disorders using the Hamburg Protocol. Materials and Methods. The study included 60 patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) aged 20–69 years, among whom 80% were women, and 63% were individuals aged 30–49 years. Diagnosis encompassed general dental examination, the Hamburg Protocol, panoramic radiography, CT, MRI (as indicated), and axiography. Patients were stratified into groups with muscular, articular, and combined disorders. Results. It was found that 51.67% of patients had muscular disorders, 16.67% had articular disorders, and 31.67% had combined disorders. Among patients with muscular disorders, 77.4% exhibited only two symptoms, whereas in combined disorders, symptoms were more numerous (36.8% had three, 31.6% had four, and 26.3% had five). The most frequent symptoms were pain on palpation of the masticatory muscles (100% in muscular disorders, 94.7% in combined disorders) and the presence of joint noises and impaired opening trajectory (80% each in particular disorders, 78.9% each in combined disorders). The symptom “premature contacts” was observed in over 50% of patients across all groups. Conclusions. The Hamburg Protocol is considered a suitable diagnostic test for the preliminary rapid diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders, even in cases with only two symptoms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SUCHASNA STOMATOLOHIYA
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576x-2025-4-37
Primary Topic
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity of Clinical Diagnostic Signs in the Examination of Individuals Suspected of Temporomandibular Disorders Using the Hamburg Protocol

Valentyn Makeyev, M. Shybinska
SUCHASNA STOMATOLOHIYA
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
article

Validity of Clinical Diagnostic Signs in the Examination of Individuals Suspected of Temporomandibular Disorders Using the Hamburg Protocol

Valentyn Makeyev, M. Shybinska
article en

Abstract

Purpose. To determine the validity of clinical diagnostic signs in the examination of individuals suspected of temporomandibular disorders using the Hamburg Protocol. Materials and Methods. The study included 60 patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) aged 20–69 years, among whom 80% were women, and 63% were individuals aged 30–49 years. Diagnosis encompassed general dental examination, the Hamburg Protocol, panoramic radiography, CT, MRI (as indicated), and axiography. Patients were stratified into groups with muscular, articular, and combined disorders. Results. It was found that 51.67% of patients had muscular disorders, 16.67% had articular disorders, and 31.67% had combined disorders. Among patients with muscular disorders, 77.4% exhibited only two symptoms, whereas in combined disorders, symptoms were more numerous (36.8% had three, 31.6% had four, and 26.3% had five). The most frequent symptoms were pain on palpation of the masticatory muscles (100% in muscular disorders, 94.7% in combined disorders) and the presence of joint noises and impaired opening trajectory (80% each in particular disorders, 78.9% each in combined disorders). The symptom “premature contacts” was observed in over 50% of patients across all groups. Conclusions. The Hamburg Protocol is considered a suitable diagnostic test for the preliminary rapid diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders, even in cases with only two symptoms.

SUCHASNA STOMATOLOHIYA
Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.