Assessing Racial Disparities in Crowdfunding Donations Through an Experimental Survey

Crowdfunding platforms represent a growing yet unequal social safety net for American families. While past research has consistently highlighted poorer donation outcomes for campaigners of color, data limitations have obscured a focus on the role of donor characteristics. Using novel data from a factorial survey in which respondents evaluated fictional crowdfunding campaigns ( n = 1,459), this study assesses the extent to which the race of both campaigner and campaign evaluator shapes respondents’ reported willingness to donate. Results from the experimental survey indicate a higher willingness to donate to Black beneficiaries, lending insight into the structural inequalities that shape racially disparate outcomes across actual campaigns. Analyses further indicate a heightened willingness to donate among Black evaluators, with this association being significantly stronger among Black respondents evaluating Black campaigners. These findings contribute to our understanding of how characteristics of both crowdfunding beneficiaries and donors, as well as social homophily between the two, shape campaign outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Currents
Published
2025-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23294965251374636
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Racial Disparities in Crowdfunding Donations Through an Experimental Survey

Ellen M. Whitehead, Brianna Lopez, Natalia Langham
Social Currents
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

Assessing Racial Disparities in Crowdfunding Donations Through an Experimental Survey

Ellen M. Whitehead, Brianna Lopez, Natalia Langham
article en

Abstract

Crowdfunding platforms represent a growing yet unequal social safety net for American families. While past research has consistently highlighted poorer donation outcomes for campaigners of color, data limitations have obscured a focus on the role of donor characteristics. Using novel data from a factorial survey in which respondents evaluated fictional crowdfunding campaigns ( n = 1,459), this study assesses the extent to which the race of both campaigner and campaign evaluator shapes respondents’ reported willingness to donate. Results from the experimental survey indicate a higher willingness to donate to Black beneficiaries, lending insight into the structural inequalities that shape racially disparate outcomes across actual campaigns. Analyses further indicate a heightened willingness to donate among Black evaluators, with this association being significantly stronger among Black respondents evaluating Black campaigners. These findings contribute to our understanding of how characteristics of both crowdfunding beneficiaries and donors, as well as social homophily between the two, shape campaign outcomes.

Social CurrentsVol. 12(6)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Ball State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.