My Symbols or Our Symbols? The Effect of Inclusive Narratives on the Acceptability of Out-Group Symbols

ABSTRACT: There are intense debates worldwide about cultural representations, including statues, flags, symbols, street names and history textbooks. They highlight the need to understand the political implications of how cultural entities are framed. Previous researchers have found that it matters whether framing narratives are inclusive or exclusive. Here, we hypothesise that inclusive narratives around the political symbols of ostensible out-groups will increase positive attitudes towards the symbols and increase support for their official adoption. Using data from (pre-registered) experiments in Ireland, North and South, we found asymmetric effects. When inclusively framed, ‘British’ symbols are more positively viewed by Southerners from the Republic of Ireland and Catholics from Northern Ireland and attract greater support as official features of a potential united Ireland. But no similar effects are observed on the views of Protestants from Northern Ireland about ‘Irish’ symbols. Antagonistic historical narratives over political symbols certainly matter, but the mutability of attitudes may vary across groups.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Irish Studies in International Affairs
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/isia.2025.a970057
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

My Symbols or Our Symbols? The Effect of Inclusive Narratives on the Acceptability of Out-Group Symbols

John Garry, Brendan O’Leary, James Pow
Irish Studies in International Affairs
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

My Symbols or Our Symbols? The Effect of Inclusive Narratives on the Acceptability of Out-Group Symbols

John Garry, Brendan O’Leary, James Pow
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: There are intense debates worldwide about cultural representations, including statues, flags, symbols, street names and history textbooks. They highlight the need to understand the political implications of how cultural entities are framed. Previous researchers have found that it matters whether framing narratives are inclusive or exclusive. Here, we hypothesise that inclusive narratives around the political symbols of ostensible out-groups will increase positive attitudes towards the symbols and increase support for their official adoption. Using data from (pre-registered) experiments in Ireland, North and South, we found asymmetric effects. When inclusively framed, ‘British’ symbols are more positively viewed by Southerners from the Republic of Ireland and Catholics from Northern Ireland and attract greater support as official features of a potential united Ireland. But no similar effects are observed on the views of Protestants from Northern Ireland about ‘Irish’ symbols. Antagonistic historical narratives over political symbols certainly matter, but the mutability of attitudes may vary across groups.

Irish Studies in International AffairsVol. 36(2)
University of Pennsylvania, Queen's University Belfast, Queen's University
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

My Symbols or Our Symbols? The Effect of Inclusive Narratives on the Acceptability of Out-Group Symbols — John Garry, Brendan O’Leary, et al. · Irish Studies in International Affairs (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS