Undergraduates’ perceptions of information, media and data literacy: Proposing an integrative assessment instrument

This study addresses the absence of integrated self-assessment tools for information, media and data literacy (MILDAL) competencies among social sciences undergraduates. It aims to develop and validate the Q-MILDAL questionnaire, a novel instrument designed to holistically measure students’ self-perceptions across these interrelated literacies. Q-MILDAL was developed through a mixed-methods framework: Content analysis of international literature to identify core dimensions (Authority, Creation, Value of Information, Research, Dialogue, Search). Qualitative validation via expert panel reviews ( n = 8) and student focus group discussions to refine clarity and relevance. And quantitative validation using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and reliability testing (Cronbach’s α) with a pilot sample of 80 students from Education, Information and Communication, and Economics programmes. The final 48-item scale demonstrated exceptional reliability (α = 0.953) and a six-factor structure aligning with the proposed dimensions. Qualitative feedback highlighted the need to simplify language and condense items, while quantitative results confirmed the tool’s robustness in capturing students’ self-assessed MILDAL competencies. Q-MILDAL is the first integrated instrument to consolidate information, media and data literacy self-perceptions into a single validated scale. Its mixed-methods design ensures both methodological rigour and practical applicability, offering educators an adaptable tool to identify gaps in literacy training and tailor curricula to interdisciplinary needs. The study advances scholarly discourse by bridging fragmented approaches to literacy assessment in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Published
2025-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006251367458
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Undergraduates’ perceptions of information, media and data literacy: Proposing an integrative assessment instrument

David Caballero Mariscal, Rosaura Fernández-Pascual, Maria Manuela Gomes de Azevedo Pinto
1 citations
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
article

Undergraduates’ perceptions of information, media and data literacy: Proposing an integrative assessment instrument

David Caballero Mariscal, Rosaura Fernández-Pascual, Maria Manuela Gomes de Azevedo Pinto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study addresses the absence of integrated self-assessment tools for information, media and data literacy (MILDAL) competencies among social sciences undergraduates. It aims to develop and validate the Q-MILDAL questionnaire, a novel instrument designed to holistically measure students’ self-perceptions across these interrelated literacies. Q-MILDAL was developed through a mixed-methods framework: Content analysis of international literature to identify core dimensions (Authority, Creation, Value of Information, Research, Dialogue, Search). Qualitative validation via expert panel reviews ( n = 8) and student focus group discussions to refine clarity and relevance. And quantitative validation using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and reliability testing (Cronbach’s α) with a pilot sample of 80 students from Education, Information and Communication, and Economics programmes. The final 48-item scale demonstrated exceptional reliability (α = 0.953) and a six-factor structure aligning with the proposed dimensions. Qualitative feedback highlighted the need to simplify language and condense items, while quantitative results confirmed the tool’s robustness in capturing students’ self-assessed MILDAL competencies. Q-MILDAL is the first integrated instrument to consolidate information, media and data literacy self-perceptions into a single validated scale. Its mixed-methods design ensures both methodological rigour and practical applicability, offering educators an adaptable tool to identify gaps in literacy training and tailor curricula to interdisciplinary needs. The study advances scholarly discourse by bridging fragmented approaches to literacy assessment in higher education.

Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Universidad de Granada (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.