CEFR’S MEDIATION, A KEY FOR TEACHING ARABIC’S DIGLOSSIA?

Mediation has emerged as the fourth mode of language activity within the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). This shift from the traditional focus on four skills to the recognition of four communication modes – reception, interaction, production and mediation – reflects an acknowledgment of the social dimension of language. As highlighted by Brian North and Enrica Piccardo, mediation takes “the dynamic nature of meaning to another level” (North and Piccardo 2016: 5). Mediation encompasses three distinct types: mediating a text, mediating concepts and mediating communication. Alongside, we also have mediating strategies that align with the new treatment of the communicative language strategies within the context of communicative language activities (reception, production, interaction and mediation). Mediation engages with different aspects, such as participating in an oral discussion involving several languages or the strategic use of plurilingual and pluricultural repertoires. Further, it addresses contexts where linguistic, social or cultural mediation is necessary to enhance accessibility and mutual understanding. Given the inherently pluriglossic nature of Arabic, characterized by frequent alternation between language levels, this study explores how CEFR mediation descriptors can be relevant for Arabic language instruction. The study discusses the implications of our findings for enhancing Arabic teaching practices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Romano-Arabica
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62229/roar_xxiv/7
Primary Topic
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CEFR’S MEDIATION, A KEY FOR TEACHING ARABIC’S DIGLOSSIA?

EDUARD BOGDAN COJANU
Romano-Arabica
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
article

CEFR’S MEDIATION, A KEY FOR TEACHING ARABIC’S DIGLOSSIA?

EDUARD BOGDAN COJANU
article en

Abstract

Mediation has emerged as the fourth mode of language activity within the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). This shift from the traditional focus on four skills to the recognition of four communication modes – reception, interaction, production and mediation – reflects an acknowledgment of the social dimension of language. As highlighted by Brian North and Enrica Piccardo, mediation takes “the dynamic nature of meaning to another level” (North and Piccardo 2016: 5). Mediation encompasses three distinct types: mediating a text, mediating concepts and mediating communication. Alongside, we also have mediating strategies that align with the new treatment of the communicative language strategies within the context of communicative language activities (reception, production, interaction and mediation). Mediation engages with different aspects, such as participating in an oral discussion involving several languages or the strategic use of plurilingual and pluricultural repertoires. Further, it addresses contexts where linguistic, social or cultural mediation is necessary to enhance accessibility and mutual understanding. Given the inherently pluriglossic nature of Arabic, characterized by frequent alternation between language levels, this study explores how CEFR mediation descriptors can be relevant for Arabic language instruction. The study discusses the implications of our findings for enhancing Arabic teaching practices.

Romano-ArabicaVol. 24(1/2025)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.