Psychometric Properties of the Everyday Ageism Scale: Results from the Experiences of Aging in Society Project

<b>Objective:</b> To comprehensively evaluate the psychometric properties of the relatively new Everyday Ageism Scale. <b>Methods:</b> Data were from the 2021-2023 <i>Experiences of Aging in Society</i> project (<i>N</i> = 237, ages 50+, multiracial/multiethnic, 72.6% female). We assessed the multidimensional structure, reliability, and validity of the Everyday Ageism Scale. <b>Results:</b> Confirmatory factor analysis generally substantiated the three-factor structure of the Everyday Ageism Scale: exposure to ageist messages, ageism in interpersonal interactions, and internalized ageism. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were satisfactory for the full scale and two of the three subscales. The scale demonstrated acceptable validity for convergence within measure, convergence criterion with three other scales used to measure ageism, and prediction of concurrent health (number of chronic physical health conditions, mental health condition). <b>Discussion:</b> Findings establish the Everyday Ageism Scale as a valid and reliable, multidimensional scale, while recommending ongoing attention to messages subscale limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Aging and Health
Published
2025-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643251378211
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric Properties of the Everyday Ageism Scale: Results from the Experiences of Aging in Society Project

Julie Ober Allen
1 citations
Journal of Aging and Health
Aging and Gerontology Research
3.60
article

Psychometric Properties of the Everyday Ageism Scale: Results from the Experiences of Aging in Society Project

Julie Ober Allen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> To comprehensively evaluate the psychometric properties of the relatively new Everyday Ageism Scale. <b>Methods:</b> Data were from the 2021-2023 <i>Experiences of Aging in Society</i> project (<i>N</i> = 237, ages 50+, multiracial/multiethnic, 72.6% female). We assessed the multidimensional structure, reliability, and validity of the Everyday Ageism Scale. <b>Results:</b> Confirmatory factor analysis generally substantiated the three-factor structure of the Everyday Ageism Scale: exposure to ageist messages, ageism in interpersonal interactions, and internalized ageism. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were satisfactory for the full scale and two of the three subscales. The scale demonstrated acceptable validity for convergence within measure, convergence criterion with three other scales used to measure ageism, and prediction of concurrent health (number of chronic physical health conditions, mental health condition). <b>Discussion:</b> Findings establish the Everyday Ageism Scale as a valid and reliable, multidimensional scale, while recommending ongoing attention to messages subscale limitations.

Journal of Aging and Health
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Michigan (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Aging and Gerontology Research
3.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Psychometric Properties of the Everyday Ageism Scale: Results from the Experiences of Aging in Society Project — Julie Ober Allen · Journal of Aging and Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS