Correction: The Deontic Wager

In this article, the first sentence of the Introduction section was published with a typo as " we should be realists about free will, that is we should act as if we really do have it" and it should have read as " we should be realists about free will, that is, we should act as if we really do have it".The first sentence of the third paragraph in the section, 'Some Preliminaries' , was published with a typo as " between metaphysical libertarianism (henceforth, libertarianism) (see, for instance, [7, 8] and leeway compatibilism (see, for instance, [9, 10], two ".It should have read as " between metaphysical libertarianism (henceforth, libertarianism) (see, for instance, [7, 8]) and leeway compatibilism (see, for instance, [9, 10]), two "In the first paragraph of section 'A Wager Argument and the Two Objections', the seventh sentence should have read as " or one where they assume that it does, he calls it the F-society" instead of " or one where they assume that it does, he calls it the the F-society".In the second paragraph of section 'The Deontic Wager and the Two Objections', the fourth sentence should have read as "Now, there are at least two ways of interpreting " instead of "Now, there are two least two ways of interpreting " and in the fourth paragraph, the third sentence should have read as "If we think that it is a purely axiological concept " instead of "If we think that is a purely axiological concept "