Preventing Campus Sexual Assault: Institutional Variation in Prevention Programming Across U.S. Colleges and Universities

The 2013 Campus SaVE Act recommends that American universities provide ongoing sexual assault prevention programming. Based on a representative sample of 381 four-year colleges and universities, we investigate institutional variation in compliance with the Campus SaVE Act’s prevention recommendations. We use theories of organizational responsiveness to legal regulation and hypothesize that coercion, capacity, and commitment shape programming. We find prevention education more likely in schools with fewer Pell grant recipients, higher tuition, and more tenure-track women faculty. Private schools, particularly Christian colleges and Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), were significantly less likely to provide prevention education than public institutions. These findings suggest an underrecognized type of educational inequality—variation in sexual assault prevention programming by institution attended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Published
2025-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737251364816
Primary Topic
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preventing Campus Sexual Assault: Institutional Variation in Prevention Programming Across U.S. Colleges and Universities

Sandra R. Levitsky, Kamaria B. Porter, Miriam Gleckman-Krut, Elizabeth A. Armstrong et al.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
article

Preventing Campus Sexual Assault: Institutional Variation in Prevention Programming Across U.S. Colleges and Universities

Sandra R. Levitsky, Kamaria B. Porter, Miriam Gleckman-Krut, Elizabeth A. Armstrong, Charlotte Hoppen
article en

Abstract

The 2013 Campus SaVE Act recommends that American universities provide ongoing sexual assault prevention programming. Based on a representative sample of 381 four-year colleges and universities, we investigate institutional variation in compliance with the Campus SaVE Act’s prevention recommendations. We use theories of organizational responsiveness to legal regulation and hypothesize that coercion, capacity, and commitment shape programming. We find prevention education more likely in schools with fewer Pell grant recipients, higher tuition, and more tenure-track women faculty. Private schools, particularly Christian colleges and Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), were significantly less likely to provide prevention education than public institutions. These findings suggest an underrecognized type of educational inequality—variation in sexual assault prevention programming by institution attended.

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
University of Michigan (US), University of California System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.