A DIGITAL MATURITY OF INSTITUTIONS IN POLAND – AN ATTEMPT AT IDENTIFICATION

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to identify and assess the level of digital maturity among institutions in Poland, with a focus on distinguishing patterns between public and private sector organizations. Design/methodology/approach: The study combines a systematic literature review with an empirical survey conducted among representatives of Polish institutions. The survey, based on a 7-point Likert scale, examined eight dimensions of digital maturity. Findings: The results indicate a moderate level of digital maturity across both public and private institutions, with notable differences in specific areas. While public institutions demonstrate higher maturity in regulated areas such as data management and infrastructure, private institutions score higher in digital leadership and cultural readiness. However, both sectors exhibit insufficient levels of innovation and agility, confirming that technological development alone does not ensure comprehensive digital transformation. Research limitations/implications: This study is limited to the Polish context and uses self reported data, which may be subject to bias. Future research could incorporate comparative studies across different countries or sectors, and expand with qualitative methods to explore internal organizational factors that support or hinder digital maturity. Practical implications: The findings offer practical insights for decision-makers and policymakers aiming to develop strategies for digital transformation. They highlight the need to support leadership development, cultural change, and integrated digital strategies beyond infrastructure upgrades. The results may inform the design of targeted support programs, especially for public institutions lagging in cultural and strategic areas. Social implications: Digital maturity has a significant impact on access to services, transparency, and responsiveness of institutions. A higher level of digital readiness in public institutions can enhance citizen trust, inclusivity, and democratic participation. Moreover, aligning digital efforts with sustainability goals can contribute to responsible innovation. Originality/value: This paper provides a rare empirical insight into the state of digital maturity in Polish institutions, bridging theoretical models with real-world application. It delivers a comparative analysis between public and private sectors and highlights the multidimensional nature of digital maturity. The article is relevant for scholars, practitioners, and public administrators engaged in digital policy and transformation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management Series
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2025.228.13
Primary Topic
Economic and Fiscal Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A DIGITAL MATURITY OF INSTITUTIONS IN POLAND – AN ATTEMPT AT IDENTIFICATION

Jakub Kol
Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management Series
Economic and Fiscal Studies
article

A DIGITAL MATURITY OF INSTITUTIONS IN POLAND – AN ATTEMPT AT IDENTIFICATION

Jakub Kol
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to identify and assess the level of digital maturity among institutions in Poland, with a focus on distinguishing patterns between public and private sector organizations. Design/methodology/approach: The study combines a systematic literature review with an empirical survey conducted among representatives of Polish institutions. The survey, based on a 7-point Likert scale, examined eight dimensions of digital maturity. Findings: The results indicate a moderate level of digital maturity across both public and private institutions, with notable differences in specific areas. While public institutions demonstrate higher maturity in regulated areas such as data management and infrastructure, private institutions score higher in digital leadership and cultural readiness. However, both sectors exhibit insufficient levels of innovation and agility, confirming that technological development alone does not ensure comprehensive digital transformation. Research limitations/implications: This study is limited to the Polish context and uses self reported data, which may be subject to bias. Future research could incorporate comparative studies across different countries or sectors, and expand with qualitative methods to explore internal organizational factors that support or hinder digital maturity. Practical implications: The findings offer practical insights for decision-makers and policymakers aiming to develop strategies for digital transformation. They highlight the need to support leadership development, cultural change, and integrated digital strategies beyond infrastructure upgrades. The results may inform the design of targeted support programs, especially for public institutions lagging in cultural and strategic areas. Social implications: Digital maturity has a significant impact on access to services, transparency, and responsiveness of institutions. A higher level of digital readiness in public institutions can enhance citizen trust, inclusivity, and democratic participation. Moreover, aligning digital efforts with sustainability goals can contribute to responsible innovation. Originality/value: This paper provides a rare empirical insight into the state of digital maturity in Polish institutions, bridging theoretical models with real-world application. It delivers a comparative analysis between public and private sectors and highlights the multidimensional nature of digital maturity. The article is relevant for scholars, practitioners, and public administrators engaged in digital policy and transformation.

Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management SeriesVol. 2025(228)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Economic and Fiscal Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.