The Role of Horizontal Resolution in Modeling Irrigation Effects With a Coupled Regional Climate Model System Up To Convection‐Permitting Scale

Abstract Increasing the resolution of regional climate models (RCMs) up to convection‐permitting scales enables explicitly resolved convection and finer resolved surface features. In this work, we use the benefits of the high resolution climate model and apply it to model irrigation effects and feedbacks on the local and regional climate, focusing on the interaction of irrigation with soil, surface, atmosphere, and vegetation processes. We employ the RCM REMO2020 interactively coupled to its vegetation module iMOVE and incorporate our newly developed irrigation parameterization. We conduct two simulation sets with and without the irrigation parameterization. In the first set, we employ the hydrostatic model version at 0.11° horizontal resolution for Southwestern Europe. For the second set, we repeat the experiment employing the non‐hydrostatic model version at convection‐permitting resolution of 0.0275° for Northern Italy. Our results indicate that improved vegetation conditions due irrigation, such as an increased canopy conductance, lead to effects in the atmosphere. For the atmosphere, we find more distinct and localized irrigation effects for the simulations at convection‐permitting resolution with enhanced near‐surface cooling of up to −2 K compared to the simulations at 0.11°. In the boundary layer, irrigation effects are highly influenced by turbulence, transporting the irrigation effect to higher levels. The largest differences in representing irrigation effects on the two resolutions were found in precipitation. While at 0.11° horizontal resolution, precipitation increases due to favorable convection conditions, explicitly resolving convection leads to rather mixed effects with a decrease of precipitation above irrigated areas, where the convection inhibition increased.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2025-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jd043227
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Horizontal Resolution in Modeling Irrigation Effects With a Coupled Regional Climate Model System Up To Convection‐Permitting Scale

Joni‐Pekka Pietikäinen, Peter Hoffmann, Diana Rechid, Christina Asmus et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Climate variability and models
article

The Role of Horizontal Resolution in Modeling Irrigation Effects With a Coupled Regional Climate Model System Up To Convection‐Permitting Scale

Joni‐Pekka Pietikäinen, Peter Hoffmann, Diana Rechid, Christina Asmus, Jürgen Böhner
article en

Abstract

Abstract Increasing the resolution of regional climate models (RCMs) up to convection‐permitting scales enables explicitly resolved convection and finer resolved surface features. In this work, we use the benefits of the high resolution climate model and apply it to model irrigation effects and feedbacks on the local and regional climate, focusing on the interaction of irrigation with soil, surface, atmosphere, and vegetation processes. We employ the RCM REMO2020 interactively coupled to its vegetation module iMOVE and incorporate our newly developed irrigation parameterization. We conduct two simulation sets with and without the irrigation parameterization. In the first set, we employ the hydrostatic model version at 0.11° horizontal resolution for Southwestern Europe. For the second set, we repeat the experiment employing the non‐hydrostatic model version at convection‐permitting resolution of 0.0275° for Northern Italy. Our results indicate that improved vegetation conditions due irrigation, such as an increased canopy conductance, lead to effects in the atmosphere. For the atmosphere, we find more distinct and localized irrigation effects for the simulations at convection‐permitting resolution with enhanced near‐surface cooling of up to −2 K compared to the simulations at 0.11°. In the boundary layer, irrigation effects are highly influenced by turbulence, transporting the irrigation effect to higher levels. The largest differences in representing irrigation effects on the two resolutions were found in precipitation. While at 0.11° horizontal resolution, precipitation increases due to favorable convection conditions, explicitly resolving convection leads to rather mixed effects with a decrease of precipitation above irrigated areas, where the convection inhibition increased.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 130(18)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.