Regional landslide susceptibility prediction considering the optimal discretization of environmental factors
This study focuses on landslide susceptibility prediction in Jiangxi Province by optimizing environmental factor discretization, using ChiMerge (CM), Natural Break (NB), and Equal Interval (EI) methods combined with statistical models (Frequency Ratio (FR), Certainty Factor (CF), and Information Value (IV)) and machine learning models (Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM)). The results indicated that the CM method outperformed NB and EI, with higher FR, IV, CF peak values, enabling more effective discretization. The CM-FR and CM-RF models performed the best, achieving an AUC of 0.7944 and an overall accuracy of 74.93%, respectively. The high and very high susceptibility zones predicted by CM-RF model covered 15.24% of the total area, and included 88.12% of historical landslides, efficiently narrowing monitoring areas. The CM method provided the most rational discretization for environmental factors, significantly improving the accuracy and reliability of landslide susceptibility prediction compared with the NB and EI methods.
Authors
- Q Liu
- Zhiling Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6797-4123)
- Xiaoting Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9698-4005)
- Faming Huang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4428-7133)
- Wen Hu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4108-6002)
- Xi Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2648-3146)
- Hao Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7577-1366)
- Hui Hu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7928-4138)
- Huaqi Gu
Institutions
- East China Jiaotong University (CN)
- Nanchang University (CN)
- Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University (CN)
- Institute of Geological Sciences (UA)
- GeoInformation (United Kingdom) (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Geocarto International
- Published
- 2025-09-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2025.2543487
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Landslides and related hazards
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.84