Inaccuracies and inconsistencies in the use of anatomical terminology in surgical disciplines

Anatomical terminology has developed over a long period of time and has undergone several revisions with the aim of unifying the nomenclature. The first systematization was created under the name Basiliensia Nomina Anatomica in 1895, the first international anatomical nomenclature Parisiensia Nomina Anatomica was adopted in 1955 and was subsequently modified until the Terminologia Anatomica version (1998). The latest revision of Terminologia Anatomica 2 (2019) caused controversy due to changes in established terms, leading to a split in opinion among experts. The Czech Anatomical Society continues to acknowledge the Terminologia Anatomica first published in 1998. Czech anatomical terminology developed less dramatically, the first systematic attempts at Czech medical terms date from the 14th-16th centuries. Significant contributions were made during the national revival and thanks to the efforts of personalities such as Wáclaw Staněk, whose work on Czech anatomical nomenclature was unfortunately not completed. The last attempt at unification was the publication of the Czech Anatomical Nomenclature in 2010. Clinical medicine did not have time enough to follow the frequent changes in anatomical nomenclature, which led to the mixing of different versions of the terms and the emergence of "clinical dialect". This resulted in inconsistencies, for example, in the naming of lymph nodes. Our contribution provides an overview of the use of older (obsolete/invalid) anatomical terms, both Czech and Latin; examples of introduced Latin terms, inaccurate use of terms, clinical simplification, spelling errors, and missing anatomical terms. Confusion in terminology can lead to misunderstandings in communication between physicians themselves, physicians and patients as well as teachers and students. Therefore, the anatomical nomenclature should be simple, clear, unanimous, uniform and widely accepted in order to serve for clear communication and prevent possible misunderstandings, errors or complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives in Surgery
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48095/ccrvch2025345
Primary Topic
Medical and Biological Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inaccuracies and inconsistencies in the use of anatomical terminology in surgical disciplines

David Kachlík, Vladimír Musil, Julia Stingl
Perspectives in Surgery
Medical and Biological Sciences
article

Inaccuracies and inconsistencies in the use of anatomical terminology in surgical disciplines

David Kachlík, Vladimír Musil, Julia Stingl
article en

Abstract

Anatomical terminology has developed over a long period of time and has undergone several revisions with the aim of unifying the nomenclature. The first systematization was created under the name Basiliensia Nomina Anatomica in 1895, the first international anatomical nomenclature Parisiensia Nomina Anatomica was adopted in 1955 and was subsequently modified until the Terminologia Anatomica version (1998). The latest revision of Terminologia Anatomica 2 (2019) caused controversy due to changes in established terms, leading to a split in opinion among experts. The Czech Anatomical Society continues to acknowledge the Terminologia Anatomica first published in 1998. Czech anatomical terminology developed less dramatically, the first systematic attempts at Czech medical terms date from the 14th-16th centuries. Significant contributions were made during the national revival and thanks to the efforts of personalities such as Wáclaw Staněk, whose work on Czech anatomical nomenclature was unfortunately not completed. The last attempt at unification was the publication of the Czech Anatomical Nomenclature in 2010. Clinical medicine did not have time enough to follow the frequent changes in anatomical nomenclature, which led to the mixing of different versions of the terms and the emergence of "clinical dialect". This resulted in inconsistencies, for example, in the naming of lymph nodes. Our contribution provides an overview of the use of older (obsolete/invalid) anatomical terms, both Czech and Latin; examples of introduced Latin terms, inaccurate use of terms, clinical simplification, spelling errors, and missing anatomical terms. Confusion in terminology can lead to misunderstandings in communication between physicians themselves, physicians and patients as well as teachers and students. Therefore, the anatomical nomenclature should be simple, clear, unanimous, uniform and widely accepted in order to serve for clear communication and prevent possible misunderstandings, errors or complications.

Perspectives in SurgeryVol. 104(8)
Research Institute of Inorganic Chemistry (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Medical and Biological Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.