ANOVA and linear regression feature selection for GRU-based foot position prediction in powered prostheses

This study evaluates feature selection using ANOVA and Linear Regression to optimize GRU-based models for predicting foot position in powered prostheses across varied terrains. Kinematic data from ten healthy participants during walking, stair ascend/descend, and standing were processed in MATLAB. Selected features, compared with Recursive Feature Elimination, trained GRU networks on mixed datasets and were tested on independent subjects. Results showed ANOVA and regression efficiently selected features with reduced computation and comparable performance. The GRU achieved RMSE as low as 0.066 radians, demonstrating robust generalization. While promising, clinical validation on amputee subjects remains necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2025.2558026
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ANOVA and linear regression feature selection for GRU-based foot position prediction in powered prostheses

Hamza Al Kouzbary, Nooranida Arifin, Taha Khamis, Noor Azuan Abu Osman et al.
1 citations
Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
0.67
article

ANOVA and linear regression feature selection for GRU-based foot position prediction in powered prostheses

Hamza Al Kouzbary, Nooranida Arifin, Taha Khamis, Noor Azuan Abu Osman, Mouaz Al Kouzbary, Hamam Mokayed, Jingjing Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates feature selection using ANOVA and Linear Regression to optimize GRU-based models for predicting foot position in powered prostheses across varied terrains. Kinematic data from ten healthy participants during walking, stair ascend/descend, and standing were processed in MATLAB. Selected features, compared with Recursive Feature Elimination, trained GRU networks on mixed datasets and were tested on independent subjects. Results showed ANOVA and regression efficiently selected features with reduced computation and comparable performance. The GRU achieved RMSE as low as 0.066 radians, demonstrating robust generalization. While promising, clinical validation on amputee subjects remains necessary.

Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering
Luleå University of Technology (SE), University of Malaya (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ANOVA and linear regression feature selection for GRU-based foot position prediction in powered prostheses — Hamza Al Kouzbary, Nooranida Arifin, et al. · Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS