Comparative functional outcome study of superficial quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon graft and a hamstring tendon. Functional outcomes are measured using the Tegner Lysholm (TL) score and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, which provide a comprehensive evaluation of knee function and patient recovery. Materials and Methods: Patients aged 18 and above with Grade 3 anterior tibial translation were included in the study. Radiological confirmation was obtained through magnetic resonance imaging to support the diagnosis. Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction was then performed using a quadriceps tendon or hamstring autograft. Postoperatively, all patients were monitored, and functional knee assessment scores were recorded and compared with pre-operative values. Postoperatively, radiographs were done at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Results: In our study, 80 patients underwent the procedure. Both the quadriceps and hamstring groups that underwent arthroscopic primary ACL reconstruction have similar outcomes in terms of IKDC and TL functional scores, with both having a P-value greater than 0.05. Conclusion: The quadriceps tendon autograft and the hamstring tendon autograft are equally effective for providing good functional scores to the knee joint.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Arthroscopic Surgery and Sports Medicine
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/jassm_29_2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative functional outcome study of superficial quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Prabhakar Rajamanickam, Mohankumar Kannaiyan, Varrdhaman H Dhariwal, Arun Iyyappan
1 citations
Journal of Arthroscopic Surgery and Sports Medicine
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
2.01
article

Comparative functional outcome study of superficial quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Prabhakar Rajamanickam, Mohankumar Kannaiyan, Varrdhaman H Dhariwal, Arun Iyyappan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon graft and a hamstring tendon. Functional outcomes are measured using the Tegner Lysholm (TL) score and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, which provide a comprehensive evaluation of knee function and patient recovery. Materials and Methods: Patients aged 18 and above with Grade 3 anterior tibial translation were included in the study. Radiological confirmation was obtained through magnetic resonance imaging to support the diagnosis. Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction was then performed using a quadriceps tendon or hamstring autograft. Postoperatively, all patients were monitored, and functional knee assessment scores were recorded and compared with pre-operative values. Postoperatively, radiographs were done at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Results: In our study, 80 patients underwent the procedure. Both the quadriceps and hamstring groups that underwent arthroscopic primary ACL reconstruction have similar outcomes in terms of IKDC and TL functional scores, with both having a P-value greater than 0.05. Conclusion: The quadriceps tendon autograft and the hamstring tendon autograft are equally effective for providing good functional scores to the knee joint.

Journal of Arthroscopic Surgery and Sports MedicineVol. 7
Stanley Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.