To Savour Consumption or To Confront Dread: The Hedonic Opportunity Cost of Attention

Abstract People face a fundamental trade-off between savouring consumption in the present and processing information. Both require attention, which is limited. As a result, directing attention to one necessarily comes at the expense of the other. We study this attentional opportunity cost, focusing on cases where information concerns potentially distressing future outcomes. Across four experiments, we find that higher present consumption reduces demand for such information and increases willingness to pay for risk mitigation. These findings have implications for models of anticipatory utility, self-regulation under limited attention and the political economy of distraction—helping to explain, for instance, why political actors might suppress demand for information by offering ‘bread and circuses’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Economic Journal
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaf091
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To Savour Consumption or To Confront Dread: The Hedonic Opportunity Cost of Attention

Joshua Tasoff, C. Mónica Capra, Jin Xu
The Economic Journal
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

To Savour Consumption or To Confront Dread: The Hedonic Opportunity Cost of Attention

Joshua Tasoff, C. Mónica Capra, Jin Xu
article en

Abstract

Abstract People face a fundamental trade-off between savouring consumption in the present and processing information. Both require attention, which is limited. As a result, directing attention to one necessarily comes at the expense of the other. We study this attentional opportunity cost, focusing on cases where information concerns potentially distressing future outcomes. Across four experiments, we find that higher present consumption reduces demand for such information and increases willingness to pay for risk mitigation. These findings have implications for models of anticipatory utility, self-regulation under limited attention and the political economy of distraction—helping to explain, for instance, why political actors might suppress demand for information by offering ‘bread and circuses’.

The Economic Journal
Claremont Graduate University (US), Claremont Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.