Turbulent Waters, or the Sublime Object of Subalternity

Abstract Mark Twain’s “Day at Niagara” (1869) concludes with a notorious moment of misrecognition, in which Twain’s buffoonish narrator mistakes a group of Irish immigrants for Indigenous people. This essay argues that this misrecognition and its contradictory reception history exemplify representational dilemmas that continue to haunt contemporary scholarship. The three monographs under review, all of which are authored by white scholars engaged with ethnic and Indigenous studies, are indicative of these ongoing quandaries. Rifkin, Stanciu, and Zaborskis strive to navigate a treacherous course between liberal modes of representation and a romanticized refusal to represent subaltern agency as they engage with wide-ranging archives of texts produced by racialized and/or Indigenous people. In their successes and failures in this endeavor, they dramatize some of American studies’ most profound unresolved tensions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Literary History
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/alh/ajaf087
Primary Topic
Latin American and Latino Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turbulent Waters, or the Sublime Object of Subalternity

Alex Trimble Young
American Literary History
Latin American and Latino Studies
article

Turbulent Waters, or the Sublime Object of Subalternity

Alex Trimble Young
article en

Abstract

Abstract Mark Twain’s “Day at Niagara” (1869) concludes with a notorious moment of misrecognition, in which Twain’s buffoonish narrator mistakes a group of Irish immigrants for Indigenous people. This essay argues that this misrecognition and its contradictory reception history exemplify representational dilemmas that continue to haunt contemporary scholarship. The three monographs under review, all of which are authored by white scholars engaged with ethnic and Indigenous studies, are indicative of these ongoing quandaries. Rifkin, Stanciu, and Zaborskis strive to navigate a treacherous course between liberal modes of representation and a romanticized refusal to represent subaltern agency as they engage with wide-ranging archives of texts produced by racialized and/or Indigenous people. In their successes and failures in this endeavor, they dramatize some of American studies’ most profound unresolved tensions.

American Literary HistoryVol. 37(3)
Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Latin American and Latino Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.