Disciplining Black Literary Study

Abstract This review essay offers an account of how two recent volumes challenge and revitalize the contemporary practice of Black literary study. Issuing from beyond the disciplinary bounds of Black literary study, Lisa Biggs’s The Healing Stage: Black Women, Incarceration, and the Art of Transformation and the edited collection, Intersecting Aesthetics: Literary Adaptations and Cinematic Representations of Blackness offer generative models for renewal. By foregrounding how Black expressive cultures develop under constraint, the volumes engage in both critique and repair elegantly negotiating (rather than reductively collapsing) the field’s persistent oppositions between formalism and politics, critique and care, and scholarly method and sociological insight. Their attention to neglected arenas, the literary and performance cultures fostered in carceral institutions and the understudied domain of Black adaptation across literature and film respectively, demonstrates how sustained attention to form, context, and audience can expand the boundaries of Black literary inquiry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Literary History
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/alh/ajaf079
Primary Topic
Race, History, and American Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disciplining Black Literary Study

Brittney Michelle Edmonds
American Literary History
Race, History, and American Society
article

Disciplining Black Literary Study

Brittney Michelle Edmonds
article en

Abstract

Abstract This review essay offers an account of how two recent volumes challenge and revitalize the contemporary practice of Black literary study. Issuing from beyond the disciplinary bounds of Black literary study, Lisa Biggs’s The Healing Stage: Black Women, Incarceration, and the Art of Transformation and the edited collection, Intersecting Aesthetics: Literary Adaptations and Cinematic Representations of Blackness offer generative models for renewal. By foregrounding how Black expressive cultures develop under constraint, the volumes engage in both critique and repair elegantly negotiating (rather than reductively collapsing) the field’s persistent oppositions between formalism and politics, critique and care, and scholarly method and sociological insight. Their attention to neglected arenas, the literary and performance cultures fostered in carceral institutions and the understudied domain of Black adaptation across literature and film respectively, demonstrates how sustained attention to form, context, and audience can expand the boundaries of Black literary inquiry.

American Literary HistoryVol. 37(3)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Race, History, and American Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.