American Services in European Perspective: Why Do Americans Not Care about Interstate Barriers in Construction?

Abstract The European Union identifies the sector of construction services as a priority for its agenda to remove barriers to cross-border activity. Taking the EU’s efforts as a starting point, this article explores the politics of interstate barriers in construction services in the United States. To what extent do US construction firms encounter internal-border barriers like those targeted by the EU? If they do, how much business mobilization and governmental response do they elicit, and what does that suggest about American federalism more generally? We find many similar barriers inside the United States but practically no mobilization or policy attention around them. Drawing on over fifty interviews with firms, associations, and public officials, we argue that this contrast to the EU highlights two features of American federalism. Institutionally, though promoting a national market motivated the federation’s creation, that goal is nobody’s active job today. Ideationally, the distinctively American skepticism of central government limits a market-building project.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Publius The Journal of Federalism
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjaf027
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

American Services in European Perspective: Why Do Americans Not Care about Interstate Barriers in Construction?

Susanne K. Schmidt, Andy Smith, Katarzyna Andrejuk, Trym Nohr Fjørtoft et al.
Publius The Journal of Federalism
European Union Policy and Governance
article

American Services in European Perspective: Why Do Americans Not Care about Interstate Barriers in Construction?

Susanne K. Schmidt, Andy Smith, Katarzyna Andrejuk, Trym Nohr Fjørtoft, Craig Parsons, Jarle Trondal
article en

Abstract

Abstract The European Union identifies the sector of construction services as a priority for its agenda to remove barriers to cross-border activity. Taking the EU’s efforts as a starting point, this article explores the politics of interstate barriers in construction services in the United States. To what extent do US construction firms encounter internal-border barriers like those targeted by the EU? If they do, how much business mobilization and governmental response do they elicit, and what does that suggest about American federalism more generally? We find many similar barriers inside the United States but practically no mobilization or policy attention around them. Drawing on over fifty interviews with firms, associations, and public officials, we argue that this contrast to the EU highlights two features of American federalism. Institutionally, though promoting a national market motivated the federation’s creation, that goal is nobody’s active job today. Ideationally, the distinctively American skepticism of central government limits a market-building project.

Publius The Journal of FederalismVol. 55(4)
Sciences Po Bordeaux (FR), University of Bremen (DE), OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), University of Oslo (NO), University of Agder (NO), Centre Émile Durkheim (FR), Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.