Spoofing in US futures markets: an interdisciplinary approach

Abstract Spoofing is a manipulative practice that can severely harm the functioning of markets. Economically, the characteristics and impact of spoofing on markets are scarcely studied. Legally, the spoofing statute is broad and complex. This article delineates all aspects of spoofing from both an economic and legal perspective by providing a comprehensive overview of spoofing types, legislation, literature, rulings, and a conceptual framework of spoofing dimensions and attributes. This framework is used to analyse 204 US spoofing cases in futures markets and highlights the nuances of spoofing. Although the empirical focus of this article is on US futures markets, the conceptual framework is generic to other markets, trading mechanisms, and jurisdictions, and it can be adapted to include other market-manipulation types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Capital Markets Law Journal
Published
2025-07-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmaf012
Primary Topic
Risk Management in Financial Firms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spoofing in US futures markets: an interdisciplinary approach

J.M.E. Pennings, Marjolein E. Verhulst
Capital Markets Law Journal
Risk Management in Financial Firms
article

Spoofing in US futures markets: an interdisciplinary approach

J.M.E. Pennings, Marjolein E. Verhulst
article en

Abstract

Abstract Spoofing is a manipulative practice that can severely harm the functioning of markets. Economically, the characteristics and impact of spoofing on markets are scarcely studied. Legally, the spoofing statute is broad and complex. This article delineates all aspects of spoofing from both an economic and legal perspective by providing a comprehensive overview of spoofing types, legislation, literature, rulings, and a conceptual framework of spoofing dimensions and attributes. This framework is used to analyse 204 US spoofing cases in futures markets and highlights the nuances of spoofing. Although the empirical focus of this article is on US futures markets, the conceptual framework is generic to other markets, trading mechanisms, and jurisdictions, and it can be adapted to include other market-manipulation types.

Capital Markets Law JournalVol. 20(3)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Urbana University (US), Maastricht School of Management (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
CERN, Wageningen University and Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Risk Management in Financial Firms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.