Net Income Aggregation, Investor Inattention, and Portfolio Holding Decisions: Evidence from the Insurance Industry

Abstract This paper uses an accounting rule change and the U.S. insurance industry to empirically show that the way in which accounting information is presented can distort equilibrium economic outcomes. When firms’ summary performance measure includes changes in unrealized gains and losses (UGL) from financial asset holdings, investor inattention causes the firms’ stock returns to overreact to changes in UGL. Inattentive investors perceive the firms’ earnings as having higher residual uncertainty and demand larger discounts on the firms’ stock prices. To maximize compensation, managers cut financial asset holdings. Managerial myopia exacerbates the response. A simple model formalizes the mechanism. (JEL: G11, G14, G22, G30, M41)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Review of Corporate Finance Studies
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfaf022
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Net Income Aggregation, Investor Inattention, and Portfolio Holding Decisions: Evidence from the Insurance Industry

Natee Amornsiripanitch, Jinjie Lin, Barry A. Goldstein, Zeqiong Huang et al.
1 citations
The Review of Corporate Finance Studies
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
3.13
article

Net Income Aggregation, Investor Inattention, and Portfolio Holding Decisions: Evidence from the Insurance Industry

Natee Amornsiripanitch, Jinjie Lin, Barry A. Goldstein, Zeqiong Huang, David Kwon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper uses an accounting rule change and the U.S. insurance industry to empirically show that the way in which accounting information is presented can distort equilibrium economic outcomes. When firms’ summary performance measure includes changes in unrealized gains and losses (UGL) from financial asset holdings, investor inattention causes the firms’ stock returns to overreact to changes in UGL. Inattentive investors perceive the firms’ earnings as having higher residual uncertainty and demand larger discounts on the firms’ stock prices. To maximize compensation, managers cut financial asset holdings. Managerial myopia exacerbates the response. A simple model formalizes the mechanism. (JEL: G11, G14, G22, G30, M41)

The Review of Corporate Finance Studies
Yale University (US), National Defence University of Warsaw (PL), Moody's Corporation (United States) (US), Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.