How to Strengthen Trust in Digital Transformation of the Court Systems? Experience from China

How to Strengthen Trust in Digital Transformation of the Court Systems? Experience from China In the 21st century, digitalization has emerged as a prominent and transformative force, reshaping nearly every aspect of modern life. The wave of digital transformation has significantly impacted judicial systems globally, with China leading this shift through the implementation of what is referred to as ‘smart justice’. This transition involves the integration of digital technologies into traditional judicial practices. While technologies offer clear benefits, including improved efficiency, transparency and accessibility, they also introduce complexities that challenge judicial trust. Trust is the foundation of any effective judicial system, and in the context of smart justice, rebuilding trust through responsible digital innovation is essential. This article categorizes the issue of trust within judicial systems by examining it through three dimensions: cognitive trust, affective trust and trust belief. It analyses the origins of the current trust challenges from these perspectives and identifies key pathways for improvement in China. Chinese courts and legal scholars have actively engaged with these challenges by exploring diverse strategies to ensure that technological adoption enhances, rather than erodes, public trust. This article critically evaluates these institutional responses and situates them within broader global discussions about digital justice. It argues that while China’s model may not be universally replicable due to political and legal particularities, it offers valuable insights into how digital transformation can be harnessed to support trust in judicial institutions. These lessons are especially relevant for other jurisdictions navigating similar digital reforms while seeking to uphold the foundational values of fairness, accountability and public trust.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Erasmus Law Review
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5553/elr.000290
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to Strengthen Trust in Digital Transformation of the Court Systems? Experience from China

Rui Wang
Erasmus Law Review
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

How to Strengthen Trust in Digital Transformation of the Court Systems? Experience from China

Rui Wang
article en

Abstract

How to Strengthen Trust in Digital Transformation of the Court Systems? Experience from China In the 21st century, digitalization has emerged as a prominent and transformative force, reshaping nearly every aspect of modern life. The wave of digital transformation has significantly impacted judicial systems globally, with China leading this shift through the implementation of what is referred to as ‘smart justice’. This transition involves the integration of digital technologies into traditional judicial practices. While technologies offer clear benefits, including improved efficiency, transparency and accessibility, they also introduce complexities that challenge judicial trust. Trust is the foundation of any effective judicial system, and in the context of smart justice, rebuilding trust through responsible digital innovation is essential. This article categorizes the issue of trust within judicial systems by examining it through three dimensions: cognitive trust, affective trust and trust belief. It analyses the origins of the current trust challenges from these perspectives and identifies key pathways for improvement in China. Chinese courts and legal scholars have actively engaged with these challenges by exploring diverse strategies to ensure that technological adoption enhances, rather than erodes, public trust. This article critically evaluates these institutional responses and situates them within broader global discussions about digital justice. It argues that while China’s model may not be universally replicable due to political and legal particularities, it offers valuable insights into how digital transformation can be harnessed to support trust in judicial institutions. These lessons are especially relevant for other jurisdictions navigating similar digital reforms while seeking to uphold the foundational values of fairness, accountability and public trust.

Erasmus Law ReviewVol. 17(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.