Effect of Peer Assessment and Artificial Intelligence Review on English Writing and Evaluation Ability

Peer assessment has been widely adopted in teaching English writing; artificial intelligence (AI) assisted teaching has also been practiced and applied in English writing teaching. Based on an in-class writing practice of 250 Chinese undergraduate students majoring in English and Translation, this study adopts an empirical comparative method and a questionnaire survey to carry out post-writing peer assessment and AI review. By comparing the similarities and differences through the practice of the two different modes, this study tries to explore their value in effectively improving undergraduates’ English writing and evaluation abilities. The questionnaire survey shows that both modes can give constructive evaluations on the content; organization; sentence expression; use of words; grammar, spelling, punctuation and other technical aspects of an essay, with the AI review providing more objective and specific feedback. In addition, in the artificial intelligence era, the use of peer assessment and AI review can optimize English writing teaching and enhance the ability of undergraduates’ English writing and evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Instruction
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2025.18428a
Primary Topic
Innovative Educational Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Peer Assessment and Artificial Intelligence Review on English Writing and Evaluation Ability

Hong Lu
International Journal of Instruction
Innovative Educational Techniques
article

Effect of Peer Assessment and Artificial Intelligence Review on English Writing and Evaluation Ability

Hong Lu
article en

Abstract

Peer assessment has been widely adopted in teaching English writing; artificial intelligence (AI) assisted teaching has also been practiced and applied in English writing teaching. Based on an in-class writing practice of 250 Chinese undergraduate students majoring in English and Translation, this study adopts an empirical comparative method and a questionnaire survey to carry out post-writing peer assessment and AI review. By comparing the similarities and differences through the practice of the two different modes, this study tries to explore their value in effectively improving undergraduates’ English writing and evaluation abilities. The questionnaire survey shows that both modes can give constructive evaluations on the content; organization; sentence expression; use of words; grammar, spelling, punctuation and other technical aspects of an essay, with the AI review providing more objective and specific feedback. In addition, in the artificial intelligence era, the use of peer assessment and AI review can optimize English writing teaching and enhance the ability of undergraduates’ English writing and evaluation.

International Journal of InstructionVol. 18(4)
Zhengzhou University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Innovative Educational Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effect of Peer Assessment and Artificial Intelligence Review on English Writing and Evaluation Ability — Hong Lu · International Journal of Instruction (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS