Analysis of metastereotypes on gender differences in empathy selection: a classification model based on machine learning

This study uses a classification model based on machine learning to explore the impact of metastereotypes on gender differences in empathy selection. The study uses a random forest model and optimizes it through feature engineering techniques such as mutual information method and principal component analysis, achieving excellent performance with an F1 score of 85.2% and an AUC of 0.91. Empathy scores and metastereotype scores were identified as key predictive features, and gender-specific SHAP value analysis showed that male decisions were more driven by empathy, while females had greater variability in the influence of metastereotypes. The gender difference coefficient (GDC) was 0.12, indicating that the gender effect was statistically significant but limited in magnitude. Visualization tools such as heat maps and box plots effectively demonstrated feature importance and gender-specific patterns, providing a solid framework for understanding the complex interaction between metastereotypes and gender differences in empathy selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3086269
Primary Topic
Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of metastereotypes on gender differences in empathy selection: a classification model based on machine learning

Yiwen Chen
Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques
article

Analysis of metastereotypes on gender differences in empathy selection: a classification model based on machine learning

Yiwen Chen
article en

Abstract

This study uses a classification model based on machine learning to explore the impact of metastereotypes on gender differences in empathy selection. The study uses a random forest model and optimizes it through feature engineering techniques such as mutual information method and principal component analysis, achieving excellent performance with an F1 score of 85.2% and an AUC of 0.91. Empathy scores and metastereotype scores were identified as key predictive features, and gender-specific SHAP value analysis showed that male decisions were more driven by empathy, while females had greater variability in the influence of metastereotypes. The gender difference coefficient (GDC) was 0.12, indicating that the gender effect was statistically significant but limited in magnitude. Visualization tools such as heat maps and box plots effectively demonstrated feature importance and gender-specific patterns, providing a solid framework for understanding the complex interaction between metastereotypes and gender differences in empathy selection.

Zhejiang Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.